期刊文献+

从日本退约谈鲸鱼法律保护问题 被引量:3

On Legal Protection of Whales from the Perspective of Japan’s Withdrawal form IWC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 日本宣布,从2019年7月起正式退出《国际捕鲸管制公约》,在其专属经济区重启商业捕鲸。日本坚持认为其捕鲸行为不违反国际法,退约前做为缔约国有在南大洋“科研”捕鲸的权利,退约后其对领海和专属经济区内的生物资源拥有主权权利;反捕鲸组织对捕鲸船的暴力行为是海盗行为、生态恐怖主义、违反海上避碰规则。由于国际法院判定日本的“科研”捕鲸是商业行为,日本退约时的声明不符合国家单方行为的法律要件,日本退约并不能停止各国间的“鲸鱼战争”。由于“鲸鱼战争”争夺的是公海和南极的资源,各国都坚持本国利益优先,冲突持续不断。“鲸鱼战争”本质上是以法律形式体现出来的政治问题,政治谈判解决是更优的选择。 Japan unilaterally announced that it would formally withdraw from the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling from July 2019,and resume commercial whaling in its exclusive economic zone.Japan insists that its whaling activities do not violate the international law,for the reasons that it has the right to scientific permit whaling in the South Ocean as the member of IWC before its withdrawing,and that it has sovereign rights over biological resources in territorial waters and exclusive economic zones after withdrawal from IWC,instead that violence against whaling vessels by anti-whaling activist groups is piracy,ecological terrorism and violation of the rules of collision avoidance at sea.Because the International Court of Justice has ruled that Japan's scientific permit whaling is a commercial whaling and does not enjoy immunity,and the declaration made by Japan at the time of withdrawal from IWC does not conform to the legal requirements of the unilateral act of the state,Japan's withdrawal from IWC cannot stop the "whale war" among countries.As the "whale war" contends for the resources of the high seas and Antarctica,every country insists on giving priority to its own interests,which leads to the continuous conflicts.Whale War is essentially a political issue in the form of law,and political negotiation is the better choice.
作者 刘恩媛 Liu Enyuan(Academy of International Law,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China;Songjiang People's Procuratorate,Shanghai 201600,China)
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第4期58-67,共10页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金 上海政法学院高原学科(国际法方向)支持计划资助
关键词 日本退约 单方法律行为 鲸鱼战争 Japan's withdrawal unilateral legal acts whale wars
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1田其云.关于海洋资源法义务本位的思考——以海洋资源分割与保护为视角[J].学术交流,2005(10):44-48. 被引量:7
  • 2韩立余.善意原则在WTO争端解决中的适用[J].法学家,2005(6):151-160. 被引量:13
  • 3[英]詹宁斯,瓦茨修订.《奥本海国际法》(第一卷第二分册).王铁崖,李适时等译.中国大百科全书出版社,1998年版,第598页注释4.
  • 4牛惠之.预防原则之研究-国际环境法处理科学不确定性风险议题之努力与争议.台大法学论丛,2005,(5).
  • 5Jacob Werksman. Book Review on the World Trade Organization and Sustainable Development [ J ]. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2007, (25).
  • 6John H. Jackson. Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • 7Margaret A. Young. The WTO' s Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: an Analysis of Biotech Case [J]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2007.
  • 8Gabrielle Marceau. Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions : the Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties [J]. Journal of World Trade, 2001, (6).
  • 9Debra M. Strauss. Feast or Famine : the Impact of the WTO Decision Favoring the U. S. Biatechnology Industry in the EU Ban of Genetically Modified Foods [J]. American Business Law Journal, 2005, (45).
  • 10Cinnamon Carlarne. The Kyoto Protocol and the WTO: Reconciling Tensions between Free Trade and Environmental Objectives [J]. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 2006, (17).

共引文献58

同被引文献25

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部