摘要
美国高校年度报告的制度变迁可以分为三个阶段,主要呈现的是三种变迁模式的特点。在把制度视为规则、组织、信念和多维概念的基础上,研究结果显示,规制变迁明确了法定报告的目的、内容和形式;规范变迁增强了报告的科学有效性;文化认知变迁突出了倾听学生心声的重要性;强制性与自愿性的制度格局有利于满足社会的多元需要,但也增加了高校的成本负担。
The institutional change in the annual report of U.S. higher education institutions can be divided into three stages characterized primarily by three models. Based on the understanding that institutions can be defined as rules, organizations, and beliefs, this study shows that changes in the regulative aspect have clarified the purpose, content, and form requirements of mandated reports;changes in the normative aspect have enhanced the scientific validity of annual reports;and changes in the cultural-cognitive aspect have integrated student voices into institutional building. While the institutional arrangement of the mandatory and voluntary reporting systems is beneficial to meet the diverse needs of society, it has also increased the cost burden on higher education institutions.
作者
李奇
LI Qi(Institute of Higher Education ,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
出处
《清华大学教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期53-58,67,共7页
Tsinghua Journal of Education
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“高等学校质量年度报告发布制度研究”(16YJA880021)
关键词
制度变迁
质量报告
年度报告
信息公开
institutional change
report on institutional quality
annual report
information disclosure