期刊文献+

营销性无形资产税基划分:从独立交易原则到市场溢价理论 被引量:1

Marketing Intangibles’ Tax Base Division:——From the Arm’s Length Principle to the Market Premium Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决无形资产的国际税基划分需求, OECD在独立交易原则下开发了利润法。然而,相关实践表明,利润法无法适用于营销性无形资产税基划分。针对营销性无形资产税基的划分,我国创造性地提出了市场溢价理论。相对于独立交易原则,市场溢价理论更具规则合理性和法律实施学价值。建议下一步通过规则完善与在国际税收合作中全方位推广其国际影响力两大措施推动市场溢价理论的发展。 In order to meet the tax base division of intangibles, the international society has developed profit methods under the Arm, Length Principle. However, it is not suited to marketing intangibles. The Market Premium Theory is a creative idea proposed by China. Comparing with Arm’s Length Principle, the Market Premium Theory is both of rule reasonableness and law enforcement values. The next step to promote its development relies two measures: the first measune is to perfect its specific rules. While the second to amplify its international influence from all - division in international tax cooperation.
作者 叶莉娜 Ye Lina
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第7期90-99,共10页 Journal of Social Sciences
基金 2018年度上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题:“中国国际税收遵从法律保障机制之架构”(项目编号:2018BFX008)的阶段性成果 上海立信会计金融学院财税重点学科专项基金资助
关键词 营销性无形资产 税基划分 市场溢价理论 独立交易原则 Marketing Intangibles International Tax Base Division the Arm's Length Principle the Market Premium Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献64

  • 1Axel Eigelshover and Kathrin Stember, "Germany New Transfer Pricing Rules", 15 International Transfer Pricing Journal (2008) .
  • 2Fris, Pim, Gonnet, Sebastien, "A European View on Transfer Pricing after Glaxo, Tax Planning International Transfer Pricing", in International Information for International Business, The Bureau of National Affairs, Washington D. C, 2006.
  • 3Giammarco Cottani, "Transfer Pricing and Intangibles: Summary of Discussion at the 61 st IFA Congress in Kyoto", 15 IBFD International Transfer Pricing Journal (2008) .
  • 4Hamaekers, Hubert, "The Ann's Length--How Long?"2 International Transfer Pricing Journal (2007).
  • 5International Fiscal Association, 2007, Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International by the International Fiscal Association, 61st Congress of the International Fiscal Association, Kyoto, 2007, Volume 92a, Subject 1 Transfer Pricing of Intangibles.
  • 6Liantang He, Xiaoyue Wang &Ymin Sun, "China SAT Analysis of U.S. GlaxoSmithKline Case", 16 Tax Management Transfer Pricing Report (2007) .
  • 7Musseli, Andrea, Marchetti Hunter, Donatella, "Glaxo Transfer Pricing Case: Economic Rationale, Legal Framework and International Issues", 3 International Transfer Pricing Journal (2007) .
  • 8Sharnon Burnett and Dariene Pulliam, "Glaxo Smith-Kline and the IRS Finally Find Relief with Zantac", 78 The CPA Journal (2008) .
  • 9International Fiscal Association, Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International by the International Fiscal Association, 61^st Congress of the International Fiscal Association, Kyoto, 2007, Volume 92a, Subject 1 "Transfer Pricing of Intangibles" .
  • 10Fris, Pim, Gonnet, Sebastien, "A European View on Transfer Pricing after Glaxo, Tax Harming International Transfer Pricing", International Information for International Business, The Bureau of National Affairs, Washington D. C, 2006.

共引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部