期刊文献+

基于案例分析的替代计量数据之科学使用方式研究 被引量:3

Study of Ways of Scientific Usage of Altmetrics Data Based on User Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以Altmetric.com公司的用户案例为分析对象,总结了科研机构、出版社、图书馆、基金会和企业这些不同主体在替代计量数据运用方面的成功经验,识别了当前替代计量数据的3种科学使用方式,即用于加强宣传推广、论证影响价值和促进科学合作。在加强宣传推广方面,替代计量数据可以提升用户体验、扩大受众范围和迎合读者兴趣。在论证影响价值方面,替代计量数据可以扩大影响力的范围、提高影响力及时性、提供资助效率反馈和用于科技考核评价。这些成功的使用方式,可以为国内研究机构、资助机构等对替代计量数据的合理使用提供参考。 The study, based on analysis of user cases of Altmetric.com company, has summarized the successful experience of application of altmetrics data by various stakeholders including research institutions, publishers, libraries, funders and enterprises. Three major ways of using altmetrics data are identified, i.e. Facilitate promotion, support claim of impact and benefit scientific collaboration. As regards facilitating promotion, altmetrics data can be used to improve user experience, broaden the audiences and satisfy readers' interest. In terms of demonstrating the impact value, alternative measurement data can expand the scope of influence, improve the timeliness of impact, provide feedback on funding efficiency, and be used for scientific and technological assessment. These successful use methods can provide reference for the rational use of alternative measurement data by domestic research institutions and funding agencies.
作者 余厚强 尹梓涵 李龙飞 常梦里 YU Houqiang;YIN Zihan;LI Longfei;CHANG Mengli(School of Economics & Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Jiangsu Nanjing, 210094, China;Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Safety Science and Technology, Jiangsu Nanjing, 210094, China)
出处 《农业图书情报》 2019年第5期21-27,共7页 Agricultural Library and Information
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金(项目编号:71804067) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(项目编号:18YJC870023)
关键词 替代计量学 案例分析 科学使用 替代计量指标 最佳实践 Altmetrics case studies scientific usage Altmetrics indicators best practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献72

  • 1王小利,马礼,张永华,隆荣文.替代农业研究综述[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,25(2):94-98. 被引量:13
  • 2邱均平,燕今伟,刘霞,等.中国学术期刊评价研究报告[M].北京:科学出版社.2011.
  • 3张红坡,张海锋.SPSS统计分析实用宝典[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2012:325-333.
  • 4Kaye H F, Julia I L, John H M,et al.The science of science policy:a federal research roadmap[EB/OL].[2014-06-10].http://scienceofsciencepolicy.net/sites/all/themes/sosp_theme3/userfiles/SoSP_Roadmap.pdf .
  • 5George A L.The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digitalage[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012,3(11):2140–2145.
  • 6Impact factors, research assessment and an alternative to REF 2014[EB/OL].[2013-06-30].http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/02/08/impact-factors-and-an-alternative-to-ref-2014/.
  • 7Publish or Perish.[2013-07-18].http://www.harzing.com.
  • 8Peter J.Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia-Siren songs and air-raid sirens[J].Online Information Review,2012,6(3):462-478.
  • 9Li Xuemei, Thelwall M.F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators[C]//Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators,2012:451-551.
  • 10Van Noorden R.A profusion of measures[J].Nature,2010,5(7300):864-866.

共引文献189

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部