摘要
中共六届六中全会前,王明领导的长江局与中共中央之间,在国共合作的一些具体问题上有过分歧,但二者之间并不存在“两条路线”的斗争;通过任弼时的报告,共产国际肯定了抗战以来中共的政治路线是正确的;1938年 9月的中共中央政治局会议与随后召开的中共六届六中全会,毛泽东对抗战进入新阶段后如何坚持抗战和巩固抗日民族统一战线作了系统阐述,但并未与王明展开“激烈的争论”,会议后期他认为“一切经过统一战线是不对的”另有他因;六届六中全会进一步确立了毛泽东在全党的领袖地位。
There were differences between the Yangtze Bureau led by Wang Ming and the Central Committee of the Communist Party on some specific issues of cooperation between the Kuomingtang of China and the Communist Party of China, before the Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.But there was no “two lines” struggle between the two sides. Through Ren Bi-shi’s report, the Communist International affirmed that the CPC’s political line since the Anti-Japanese War was correct. At the meeting of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in September 1938 and the Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the Communist Party, Mao Ze-dong made a systematic exposition on how to persist in the Anti-Japanese War and consolidate the Anti-Japanese National United Front after entering a new stage of the Anti-Japanese War, but did not launch a fierce debate with Wang Ming. Later in the meeting, for some reasons Mao Ze-dong said that “It is maybe a mistake for everything going through United Front”. This meeting further established Mao Ze-dong’s leading position of the Party.
作者
罗平汉
LUO Ping-han(Department of Party History Study,Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C,Beijing 100091,China)
出处
《安徽史学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期89-103,共15页
Historical Research In Anhui
关键词
中共六届六中全会
统一战线
独立性
Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China
united front
independence