康有为、谭嗣同经典观的同与异

The Similarities and Differences in the Views of Classics of Kang Youwei and Tan Sitong

与其他近代哲学家相比,康有为、谭嗣同对国学经典的选择呈现出明显的一致性,那就是侧重六经、四书代表的儒家经典,对《春秋》(《春秋公羊传》)《周易》更是奉若神明。在这个前提下尚须看到,康有为的第一经典是《春秋》,谭嗣同的第一经典则非《易》莫属。康有为、谭嗣同对《春秋》与《易》的不同偏袒既展示了不同的经典观,又直接影响了两人的国学观。如果说前一点决定了康有为、谭嗣同对孔子以及孔学的推崇的话,那么,后一点则决定了两人对孔学的不同理解以及对儒学的不同态度。

Compared with other modern philosophers,Kang Youwei and Tan Sitong had an agreement on the choice of Chinese classics,which was the preference of Confucian classics represented by Six Classics and Four Books,especially the worship of Chun Qiu,Gong Yang Zhuan and Zhou Yi.It also needs to be noticed that ChunQiuis Kang's favorite while Yi is Tan's favorite.Kang and Tan's different favoritism of Chun Qiu and Yi embodies diverse views of classics,which directly influenced their views of Chinese studies.If the former decides Kang and Tan's worship of and Confucianism,the latter determines their disparate understandings of Confucius and different attitudes towards Confucianism.