期刊文献+

粪肠球菌ace阳性和阴性菌株体外生物被膜形成能力比较 被引量:2

Biofilm formation ability of Enterococcus faecalis ace positive and negative strains in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较粪肠球菌ace基因阳性、阴性菌株的生物被膜形成能力,探讨粪肠球菌ace基因是否有利于细菌生物被膜的形成。方法微量滴定板法检测46株临床分离粪肠球菌的生物膜形成能力,PCR方法检测其ace基因,比较生物膜阳性组、阴性组粪肠球菌ace基因检出率;将粪肠球菌ATCC29212(ace^+)、野生株U8-ace^-、空质粒对照株EU8-ace^-、转化株ZU8-ace^+接种到96孔板,培养3h、6h、12h、24h、36h、48h,结晶紫染色,测定OD570,微量滴定板法比较ATCC29212(ace^+)、U8-ace^-、EU8-ace^-以及ZU8-ace^+的生物被膜形成能力;将ATCC29212(ace^+)、U8-ace^-、EU8-ace^-、ZU8-ace^+在含盖玻片的细胞培养皿内培养6h^72h,共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)观察比较ace^+、ace^-粪肠球菌形成的生物膜平均厚度和密度。结果生物膜阳性组粪肠球菌ace基因检出率为76.67%,高于生物膜阴性组31.25%的检出率,差别有统计学意义(χ^2=9.04,P>0.05);微量滴定板法显示不同时间点ATCC29212(ace^+)以及转化株ZU8-ace^+的OD570值都大于U8-ace^-的OD570值,P<0.01,而EU8-ace^-与U8-ace^-比较,OD570值无统计学差别,P>0.05;CLSM观测的ace^+粪肠球菌在不同阶段所形成的生物膜的平均厚度、密度均高于ace^-粪肠球菌,P<0.01,空质粒对照株与野生株比较,生物膜的厚度、密度无统计学差别,P>0.05。结论粪肠球菌胶原黏附素ace基因或有利于肠球菌生物被膜的形成。 In this work, we explore whether the ace gene of E. faecalis is beneficial to the biofilm formation by comparing the biofilm formation ability of E. faecalis ace positive and negative strains. The ability of biofilm formation of 46 clinical isolates of E. faecalis was detected by microtitration plate method, and the ace gene of E. faecalis was detected by PCR. The detection rates of ace gene of E. faecalis in biofilm positive and negative groups were compared. E.faecalis strains ATCC29212- ace^+(clinical isolates),U8- ace^-,EU8- ace^-,ZU8- ace^+ were cultivated in 96-well culture plate for 3hours,6hours,12hours,24hours,36hours,48hours, OD 570 were detected after Gram crystal violet staining. The ability of biofilm formation of ace^+ or ace^- strains were detected and compared by microtiter plate assay;E. faecalis strains ATCC29212( ace^+),U8- ace^-,EU8- ace^- and ZU8- ace^+ strains were cultured on cover glasses in cell culture dish for 6-72 hours, the mean thickness and density of biofilms of ace^+ or ace^- E. faecalis strains at different incubation time were observed and compared by CLSM. It was shown that the detection rate of ace gene of Enterococcus in positive biofilm group was 76.67%, which was higher than that in negative biofilm group 31.25%(χ^2= 9.04, P >0.05);all the OD 570 value of wild strains ATCC29212( ace^+)and transformed plants ZU8- ace^+were greater than that of wild plants U8- ace^- respectively at different culture time points, P <0.01, while there was no significant difference between the empty plasmid control strain and the wild strain, P >0.05;the mean thickness,density of biofilms of ATCC29212( ace^+),ZU8- ace^+ observed by CLSM were all greater than that of wild strains U8- ace^- respectively ( P <0.01). There was no significant difference between control strains and wild strains ( P >0.05). It is concluded that E. faecalis ace might be in favor of the biofilm formation.
作者 强华 刘光英 林任玺 QIANG Hua;LIU Guang-ying;LIN Ren-xi(Department of Etiology,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350122,China)
出处 《中国人兽共患病学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期599-603,共5页 Chinese Journal of Zoonoses
基金 福建省自然科学基金(No.2016J01362)~~
关键词 粪肠球菌 粪肠球菌胶原结合蛋白基因ace 生物被膜 共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM) Enterococus faecalis adhesin to collagen of E. faecalis(ace) biofilms confocal laser scranning microscopy (CLSM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Fux CA,Costerton JW,Stewart PS,et al.Survival strategies of infectious biofilms[J].Trends Microbiol,2005,13(1):34-40.DOI:10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.010.
  • 2Nallapareddy SR,Singh KV,Sillanpaa J,et al.Endocarditis and biofilm associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis[J].J Clin Inves tig,2006,116(10):2799-2807.DOI:10.1172/JCI29021.
  • 3Low YL,Jakubovics NS,Flatman JC,et al.Manganese depend ent regulation of the endocarditis associated virulence factor EfaA ofEnterococcus faecalis[J].J Med Microbiol,2003,52 (2):113-119.DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.05039-0.
  • 4Shorrock PJ,Lambert PA,Aitchison EJ,et al.Serological re sponse in Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis determined by en zyme-linked immunosorbent assay[J].J Clin Microbiol,1990,28(2):195-200.
  • 5Pillai SK,Sakoulas G,Eliopoulos GM,et al.Effects of glucose on fsr mediated biofilm formation in Enterococcus faecalis[J].J Infect Dis,2004,190(9):967-970.DOI:10.1086/423139.
  • 6Heikens E,Bonten MJ,Willems RJ.Enterococcus surface pro tein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faeci umE1162[J].Bacteriology,2007,22(189):8233 8240.DOI:10.1128/JB.01205-07.
  • 7Zhang L,Nguyen J,Epelman S,et al.Enterococcal endocarditis presenting as an isolated aortic valve aneurysm:case report and review of literature[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2008,21(12):1391-1396.DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2008.10.002.
  • 8Tendolkar PM,Baghdayan AS,Shankar N.Putative surface proteins encoded within a novel transferable locus confer a high biofilm phenotype to Enterococcus faecalis[J].J Bacteriol,2006,188(6):20632072.DOI:10.1128/JB.188.6.2063-2072.2006.
  • 9Bourgogne A,Kavindra VS,Kristina A,et al.EbpR is impor tant for biofilm formation by activating expression of the endo carditis and biofilm-associated Pilus Operon (ebpABC) of En terococcus faecalis OG1RF[J].J Bacteriol,2007,189 (17):6490-6493.DOI:10.1128/JB.00594-07.
  • 10Mohamed JA,Murray BE.Lack of correlation of gelatinase production and biofilm formation in a large collection of Entero coccusfaecalis isolates[J].J Clin Microbiol,2005,43 (10):5405-5407.DOI:10.1128/JCM.43.10.5405-5407.2005.

共引文献9

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部