基于比较文学平行研究的欧美汉学文化

Sinology in Europe and America Based on Parallel Studies of Comparative Literature

传统研究方法采用单一对比方式研究欧美汉学文化,导致研究结果精准度较低。为了改善该问题,提出了基于比较文学平行研究方法。通过研究论著将比较文学平行研究分为三种对比方式,分别是两极对比式方法研究、以特定命题或解释框架对比和以问题意识为线索对比。其中两极对比是将欧美汉学文化视为两种不同类型文化,对莫言小说进行文艺评判;以特定命题或解释框架对比是基于解释模式来开展的思想平行比较,以各种差异性为线索对比欧美汉文化在词语表达意义;以问题意识为线索对比汉文化研究方面解决方法上的差异。借助于三种对比方式,研究欧美汉学文化,通过实例研究结果可知,该方法最高研究精准度可达到95%,促进了汉文化在欧美国家的传播。

Traditional research methods adopt a single comparative approach to study Sinology culture in Europe and the United States, resulting in a low accuracy of the research results. The parallel study of comparative literature is divided into three kinds of contrastive ways through the research works, namely, the bipolar contrastive method, the contrastive method with specific propositions or explanatory frameworks, and the contrastive method with question consciousness as the clue. Among them, the bipolar comparison takes the Sinological culture of Europe and America as two different types of culture, and makes literary and artistic judgments on Mo Yan’s novels;the specific proposition or interpretation framework is based on the parallel comparison of ideas based on the interpretation model;the differences are used as clues to compare the expressions of European and Chinese cultures in words;and the question consciousness is used as clues. The differences between Chinese and Western culture research methods are compared. With the help of three contrastive methods, the study of Sinology culture in Europe and America is carried out. The results show that the highest accuracy of this method can reach 95%, which promotes the spread of Chinese culture in Europe and America.