摘要
“事实”的认定对具体诉讼制度和程序设计具有指引作用。传统证据法意义上的客观真实是一种绝对论下的事实真相,法律真实则忽视了对案件事实的认识。法律适用的事实是在证据裁判原则主导下的案件事实,而发现案件事实需要在实在法的规范下进行。《监察法》中的“事实”具有两种含义,第一种是宣示意义的事实,第二种是通过证据来获得对案件认识的事实。《监察法》以实体公正和效率价值为主构建了诉讼结构,但应当更加注意程序公正的完善。
The confirmation of“facts”plays a guiding role in the specific litigation system and procedure design.The objective truth in the sense of traditional evidence law is a kind of factual truth under absolutism,while the legal truth ignores the understanding of the facts of the case.The facts applicable to law are the facts of a case under the guidance of the principle of evidence adjudication,and the discovery of the facts of a case needs to be carried out under the norms of the substantive law.The“facts”in the Supervision Law have two meanings.The first is the declarative facts,and the second is the facts that can be obtained through evidence.The Supervisory Law mainly constructs the litigation structure with the value of substantive justice and efficiency,but more attention should be paid to the perfection of procedural justice.
作者
马康
MA Kang(Chinese Academy of Discipline Inspection and Supervision,Beijing 100877,China)
出处
《时代法学》
2019年第4期59-65,共7页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
监察法
诉讼真实
事实
法律规范
法律价值
supervision law
litigation truth
facts
legal norms
legal value