期刊文献+

纪录片“真实性”与“客观性”新议

下载PDF
导出
摘要 “真实性”释义“真实性”概念的内涵和外延因科学技术发展而发生变化,本文试从纪录片史论的角度入手,分析一些代表性纪录片学派对“真实性”的认知,总结各个纪录片学派在阐述"真实性”过程中呈现出的共性。
作者 罗延财
出处 《青年记者》 北大核心 2019年第20期76-77,共2页 Youth Journalist
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献43

  • 1张雅欣.纪录片不需强行定义[J].中国电视,2005(6):42-43. 被引量:10
  • 2倪祥保.应该努力为纪录片定义[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,22(4):83-87. 被引量:18
  • 3Carl Plantinga, Carl Plantinga Responds to DirkEitzen's "When Is a Documentary?: Documentary as a Mode of Reception", Cinema Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Autumn, 1996).
  • 4Dirk Eitzen, When Is a Documentary?: Documentary as a Mode of Reception, Cinema Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Autumn, 1996).
  • 5Dai Vaughan, Television Documentary Usage, BFI, 1976, p. 1.
  • 6John Grierson, "The Documentary Producer," Cinema Quarterly Vol. 2 Issue 1, Autumn, 1932.
  • 7Raymond Spottiswoode, A Grammar of the Film, University of California Press, 1959, p.285.
  • 8Satyajit Ray, The Question of Reality, in Lewis Jacobs (ed.), The Documentary Tradition, 2nd ed., Norton&Company, 1979, p.381.
  • 9John Grierson, First Principles of Documentary, in Forsyth Hardy (ed.), Grierson on Documentary, Faber, p. 35.
  • 10John Grierson, undated untitled paper beginning "Against this background some indication of the part of the cinema is possible" (Grierson Archive: G2. 8. 7, 1933), p. 1.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部