系统脱敏法治疗功能性胃肠病的疗效

Curative effect of systemic desensitization in treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders

目的探讨功能性胃肠病患者实施系统脱敏法治疗的临床效果。方法选取2015年7月~2018年6月我院消化内科及门诊收治的功能性胃肠病患者共105例为研究对象,根据患者入院时间先后顺序进行分组,包括对照组52例,观察组53例。对照组患者临床治疗中开展常规药物疗法,观察组患者给予常规药物疗法基础上行系统脱敏法治疗,两组患者治疗前后均行焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、临床症状自评量表(Scl-90)检测,以评定两组患者负性情绪和临床症状改善效果。结果治疗前两组患者SAS、SDS及Scl-90评分数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组患者SAS、SDS及Scl-90评分相比同组治疗前均有显著下降,其中观察组下降趋势更为理想,经比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论功能性胃肠病患者实施系统脱敏法治疗效果理想,可有效改善患者负面情绪,促进其临床症状改善,对患者的康复具有积极影响,因此该种治疗方法值得在临床中进行推广。

Objective To explore the clinical curative effect of systemic desensitization in treatment of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Methods 105 patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders who were admitted and treated in department of gastroenterology and outpatients in our hospital from July 2015 to June 2018 were selected as research subjects. According to the order of admission, they were divided into the control group with 52 cases and the observation group with 53 cases. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional drug therapy while patients in the observation group were treated with conventional drug therapy combined with systematic desensitization. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), self-rating clinical symptoms scale (Scl-90) were tested before and after treatment in both groups to assess the negative emotions and the improvement of clinical symptoms. Results Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in SAS, SDS and Scl-90 scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the scores of SAS, SDS and Scl-90 in the two groups were decreased significantly compared with those before treatment. The trend of decline in the observation group was more ideal. The difference in data was significant and the difference was statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion Systematic desensitization therapy for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders has an ideal effect. It can effectively improve patients’ negative emotions and the improvement of their clinical symptoms. It has a positive effect on patients’ rehabilitation. Therefore, this treatment method is worth promoting in clinical practice.