期刊文献+

情绪障碍对ACS患者NLR水平和GRACE评分危险分层的影响 被引量:4

Effects of mood disorders on NLR and risk stratification of GRACE scores in ACS patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究情绪障碍对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者自身炎症反应及病情严重程度的影响。方法:收集190例ACS患者的临床资料,采用GRACE评分标准对所有患者进行危险分层。所有入选患者住院期间接受ACS标准化治疗,患者出院前7 d内完成患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)以评估患者情绪状态,分析情绪障碍对患者炎症指标中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)及GRACE评分危险分层的影响。结果:(1)ACS患者中有抑郁障碍者占34.2%(65例),焦虑障碍者占28.9%(55例),其中抑郁合并焦虑者占9.5%(18例)。(2)GRACE危险分层高危组PHQ-9评分、GAD-7评分及NLR水平均高于中危组和低危组(9.10±4.13 vs. 7.29±3.79 vs. 5.90±4.27,9.51±3.77 vs. 7.83±4.79 vs. 4.98±4.55,4.61±5.38 vs. 3.72±2.47 vs. 2.86±1.92,P<0.05),有抑郁、焦虑症状组GRACE评分、NLR水平均高于无抑郁、焦虑症状组(119.89±30.20 vs.98.00±23.49,121.43±28.46 vs. 97.96±24.65,4.51±4.75 vs.3.25±2.54,4.62±5.27 vs. 3.23±2.03,P <0.01)。(3)以GRACE评分为因变量行多因素回归分析显示,PHQ-9评分、GAD-7评分及NLR水平与GRACE评分呈正相关关系。结论:情绪障碍可使ACS患者炎症反应指标NLR升高,病情加重,及时发现ACS患者情绪障碍及关注NLR水平可优化患者预后评估。 Objective: To study the effects of mood disorders on the inflammatory response and severity of acute coronary syndrome. Methods: Clinical data of 190 patients with ACS were collected and risk assessment and risk stratification were conducted for all patients with GRACE score. All selected patients received ACS routine treatment, patients were discharged from hospital within 7 days before completing patient health questionnaire(PHQ-9) and anxiety scale(GAD-7)in the evaluation of patients’ emotional state, mood disorder, and whether NLR and GRACE score is related to the risk stratification was generalized. Results:(1)The proportion of patients with depressive disorder were 34.2%(65 cases), 28.9%(55 cases) and 9.5%(18 cases) with depression and anxiety.(2)The levels of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and NLR in the high-risk groups of parliamentary GRACE hazard stratification were higher than those in the middle and low risk groups(9.10±4.13 vs. 7.29±3.79 vs. 5.90±4.27, 9.51±3.77 vs. 7.83±4.79 vs. 4.98±4.55,4.61±5.38 vs. 3.72±2.47 vs. 2.86±1.92, P <0.05),and GRACE scores and NLR levels in the emotionally impaired group were higher than those in the non-mood disorder group(119.89±30.20 vs. 98.00±23.49, 121.43±28.46 vs. 97.96±24.65, 4.51±4.75 vs. 3.25±2.54, 4.62±5.27 vs. 3.23±2.03, P <0.01).(3)Multivariate regression analysis with GRACE score as the dependent variable showed that phq-9 score, GAD-7 score and NLR level were positively correlated with GRACE score. Conclusion: Emotional disorder, NLR and GRACE score of ACS patients are correlated. Timely detection of emotional disorder of ACS patients and attention to NLR level may optimize prognosis assessment of patients.
作者 刘燕霞 刘相丽 LIU Yan-xia;LIU Xiang-li(Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China)
出处 《天津医科大学学报》 2019年第3期267-270,共4页 Journal of Tianjin Medical University
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 抑郁 焦虑 NLR GRACE评分 acute coronary syndrome depression anxiety NLR GRACE scores
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献58

  • 1刘遂心,朱洁,孙明,邓丽华,蒋丽华.有氧运动干预对心血管神经症的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(5):421-422. 被引量:15
  • 2Francois Lespérance Nancy Frasure-Smith Diana Koszycki 顾佳(译).西酞普兰及人际心理治疗对合并抑郁症的冠心病患者的影响——加拿大心脏病人群抗抑郁药及心理治疗疗效随机试验(CREATE)[J].美国医学会杂志(中文版),2007,26(4):232-232. 被引量:36
  • 3Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guide- lines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3): 267-315.
  • 4Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain: the value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243.
  • 5Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental dia- gnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209.
  • 6Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(8):880-892.
  • 7Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Muhicenter evaluation of a 0-hour / 1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-01502.
  • 8Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16): 1211-1218.
  • 9Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20): 2569-2619.
  • 10Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should pa- tients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score[J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425.

共引文献379

同被引文献56

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部