期刊文献+

德性伦理学的基本特征及其与道义论、功利论伦理学的根本区别 被引量:8

The Basic Characteristics of Virtue Ethics and Its Fundamental Differences with Deontology and Utilitarianism
原文传递
导出
摘要 德性伦理学以行为者为中心,而道义论和功利论伦理学以行为为中心。以行为者为中心,不能不涉及人的道德心理(动机、欲望、情感、品格等),并且将德性作为其理论的基本概念;以行为为中心,以康德为代表的道义论将普遍法则和义务置于其中心,功利论将功利置于其中心。道义论与功利论也有其德性论,但在其理论中都处于从属性地位,康德道义论的德性论体现的是履行义务的力量,而密尔的德性论既上承边沁,也受到斯多亚派和基督教道德观的影响。 Virtue ethics takes the agent as the center, while deontology and utilitarianism take the action as the center,The agent as the center, Virtue ethics has no choice but to be concerned to people's Moral Psychology (motivation, desire, emotion, character, etc.), withvirtue as its basic concept;action as the center, represented by Kant deontology which takes universal principles and obligations in its center, the utilitarianism puts utility in its center. Deontology and utilitarianism have their theories of virtue, but in its theory are subordinate, Kant's deontology's theory of virtue is the embodiment of the obligations and so that the virtue is the power.While Mill inherits Ben tham and is affected by the stoic and Christian ethics.
作者 龚群 GONG Qun(School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872)
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第4期45-54,共10页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 中国人民大学2019年度“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项基金”
关键词 德性伦理学 道义论 功利论 德性 virtue ethics deontology utility virtue
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Adams, R. M. , 2006, A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Anscombe, G. E. M. , 1981, "Modem moral philosophy", in The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe 3, Minneapolis, MN : University of Minnesota Press.
  • 3Das, R. , 2003, "Virtue ethics and fight action", in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 ( 3 ).
  • 4Driver, J. , 2001, Uneasy Virtue, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Frankena, W. , 1973, Ethics (2nd edition), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • 6Garcia, J. L. A. , 1999, "Virtue ethics", in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd edition) , ed. by R. Audi.
  • 7Hurka, T. , 2001, Virtue, Vice and Value, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Hursthouse, R. , 1996, "Normative virtue ethics", in How Should One Live? ed. by R. Crisp, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 91999, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • 10Jost, L.J. , 2006, "Virtue and vice", in Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( 2nd edition ) 9, ed. by D. M. Borchert, Farmington Hills, MI : Thomson Gale.

共引文献14

同被引文献69

引证文献8

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部