卡尔·拉伦茨与伯恩·魏德士的漏洞理论比较评述

A Comparative Review of Karl Larenz’s and Bernd Ruthers’s Vulnerability Theory

卡尔·拉伦茨与伯恩·魏德士在各自的法学理论著作中均针对漏洞理论开展了研究和分析,二者的漏洞理论虽在漏洞概念、范围、种类及漏洞填补方式等基本问题上存在差异甚至对立,但都认同漏洞是否存在是一种主观评价的过程。对二者漏洞理论的比较评述,目的不在于讨论孰优孰劣,而在于明确二者理论的差异有其各自的社会历史、法律体系和司法体系背景,对其观点的引用应注意前提条件的对应,而不能根据需要断章取义。

Karl Larenz and Bernd Ruthers have studied and analyzed the vulnerability theory in their respective legal theories.Although there are differences and even oppositions in the basic concepts of vulnerability,scope,types and filling methods,they both agree that the existence of vulnerabilities is a process of subjective evaluation.The purpose of comparing the two theories is not to judge which one is better or worse,but rather to clarify that the differences between them have their own social history,legal system and judicial system background.A citation of his point of view should be noticed with attention to the correspondence of prerequisites,not out of context as needed.