期刊文献+

试论算法的法律保护模式 被引量:6

On the Legal Protection Mode of Algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该采用何种法律模式对算法进行保护,是值得关注的问题。国内理论研究不足的情况下,有必要以美国为鉴。结合我国当前算法技术发展的特点和发展现状,宜采用专利模式对“白箱”算法和“灰箱”算法施以保护。然而,“黑箱”算法、“感知”算法和“奇异”算法因能实现自我规划和自我设计,已经脱离了人类的有效控制,变得不可预测和不可解释,若对这三种高阶算法继续采用专利或商业秘密等专属性法律保护模式,将会严重冲击《知识产权法》及其实施细则的现有框架。因而,不再对这三种高阶算法设定专门法律保护模式的情况下,宜采用非专属性激励机制对这三种高阶算法的设计者、研发者施以奖励。 Which legal mode should be adopted to protect the algorithm is a problem worth paying attention to. It is necessary to take the United States as a mirror for the deficiency of domestic theoretical research. Considering the status quo of algorithm technology in China, we should protect the "white box" algorithm and the "gray box" algorithm with patent mode."Black box" algorithm,"perception"algorithm and "strange" algorithm can plan and design freely by themselves, and lose effective control of human beings, becoming unpredictable and inexplicable. If the patent protection mode continues to be adopted to these three kinds of high order algorithm ,it will have a deadly impact on the existing framework of the patent law and its detailed rules for the implementation. Therefore, the legal protection mode is no longer be considered, non-exclusive incentive mechanism should be adopted to reward the designers and developers of these three high-order algorithms, so as to enhance their enthusiasm for innovation and ensure the orderly progress of social progressive innovation.
作者 孙建丽
出处 《电子知识产权》 CSSCI 2019年第6期39-47,共9页 Electronics Intellectual Property
基金 国家社科基金项目“一站式版权交易平台理论与实践研究”(15BFX145)
关键词 算法 专利 商业秘密 非专属性激励机制 Algorithm Patent Trade Secret Non-Exclusive Incentive Mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

共引文献90

同被引文献104

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部