期刊文献+

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的效果研究 被引量:6

The Effect of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on Early Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析对比对早期胃癌患者分别实施传统术式、内镜黏膜下剥离手术(ESD)进行治疗的效果,以及对其并发症的影响情况。方法随机抽取2017年7月—2018年7月本院胃肠外科临床接收并施予传统手术进行治疗的44例早期胃癌患者为甲组,再选取同时间段接收并施予ESD进行治疗的44例早期胃癌患者为乙组,对两组的手术效果进行比较。结果(1)乙组手术时长、失血量以及术后住院时长均较甲组少,乙组治愈性切除率较甲组高,术后并发症的总发生率较甲组低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)术后乙组QOL评分较甲组高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统手术相比,内镜黏膜下剥离手术治疗早期胃癌的效果更为显著,价值更高。 Objective To analyze and compare the effects of traditional surgical and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on early gastric cancer patients and their effects on complications. Methods A total of 44 patients with early gastric cancer who received and received traditional surgery from July 2017 to July 2018 were randomly selected as group A. Then 44 patients with early gastric cancer received ESD at the same time were selected as group B. The surgical effects of the two groups were compared. Results (1) The operation time, blood loss and hospitalization time of group B were less than those of group A. The curative resection rate of group B was higher than that of group A. The total incidence of complications after operation was lower than that of group A. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).(2) The QOL score of group B was higher than that of group A, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional surgery, the effect of submucosal dissection surgery on early gastric cancer is more significant and of higher value.
作者 刘名奎 冯创 付涛 刘承灏 LIU Mingkui;FENG Chuang;FU Tao;LIU Chenghao(Department of General Surgery, Wuhan Wuchang Hospital, Wuhan Hubei 430061, China;Department of Anorectal, Wuhan Wuchang Hospital, Wuhan Hubei 430061, China;Department of Surgery, Wuhan Chemical Industry Park Construction Health Center, Wuhan Hubei 430061, China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2019年第21期95-97,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 早期胃癌 传统术式 ESD 手术效果 并发症 QOL评分 early gastric cancer traditional surgery ESD surgical outcome complications QOL score
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献66

  • 1Antonio Facciorusso,Matteo Antonino,Marianna Di Maso,Nicola Muscatiello.Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2014,6(11):555-563. 被引量:57
  • 2日本胃癌学会.胃癌治療ガイドラインー医師周年月改訂版:胃癌の治療法の種類とその適応.3版.東京:金原出版ネ士2010.
  • 3Kim MC, Kim KH, Kim HH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrentony and extraperi gastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol,2005,91 (1):90-94.
  • 4Kitano S,Shiraishi N,Uyama I,et al.A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrentony for early cancer in Japan.Ann Surg,2007,245 (1):68-72.
  • 5Maruyama K,Kaminishi M,Hayashi K,et al.Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan:data analysis of nationwide registry.Gastric Cancer,2006,9 (2):51-66.
  • 6Cuschieri A,Weeden S,Fieldiny J,et al.Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer:long- term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial.Surgical Co-operative Group.Br J Cancer,1999,79(9-10):1522 -1530.
  • 7Songun I,Putter H,Kranenbarg EM,et al.Surgical treatment of gastric cancer:15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1 D2 trail.Lancet Oncol,2010,11 (5):439-449.
  • 8Wu CW, Hsiung CA,Lo SS,et al.Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trail.Lancet Oncol,2006,7 (4):309-315.
  • 9Edwards P, Blackshaw GR, Lewis WG, et al.Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma.Br J Cancer,2004,90 (10):1888-1892.
  • 10Yu W, Choi GS, Chung HY.Randomized clinical trial of splenectomy versus splenic preservation in patients with proximal gastric cancer.Br J Surg,2006,93(5):559-563.

共引文献73

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部