期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术与传统手术治疗胆管结石临床效果对比研究

A Comparative Study of Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery and Traditional Surgery in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜手术与传统手术治疗胆管结石的临床效果。方法:抽取笔者所在医院2015年8月-2018年10月收治的胆管结石100例患者为研究样本,以Excel随机函数法分为传统组和治疗组,各50例。传统组采取传统手术治疗,治疗组采取腹腔镜手术治疗,观察并对比两组临床效果。结果:治疗组手术时间、术中出血量、术后6 h疼痛评分、术后疼痛持续时间、术后引流量、胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、并发症发生率均优于传统组(P<0.05)。结论:与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术具有微创优势,且安全性高,能有效改善胆管结石患者预后质量,可作为临床理想术式。 Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of bile duct stones.Method:100 patients with bile duct stones admitted to our hospital from August 2015 to October 2018 were selected as research samples.Excel random function method was used to divide into the traditional group and the treatment group,50 cases in each group.The traditional group was treated with traditional surgery,while the treatment group was treated with laparoscopic surgery.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and compared.Result:The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,pain score 6 hours after operation,pain duration after operation,drainage volume after operation,recovery time of gastrointestinal function,hospitalization time and incidence of complications in the treatment group were better than those of the traditional group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional laparotomy,laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of minimally invasive,high safety,and can effectively improve the prognosis quality of patients with bile duct stones,which can be used as an ideal clinical operation.
作者 覃勇 陶锐 QIN Yong;TAO Rui(Chongqing Bishan District People’s Hospital,Chongqing 402760,China)
出处 《中外医学研究》 2019年第20期109-111,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 胆管结石 腹腔镜手术 传统开腹手术 临床效果 Bile duct stones Laparoscopic surgery Traditional laparotomy Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献90

  • 1黄黎.内镜联合腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆管结石的临床疗效对比[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2016,29(32):36-37. 被引量:1
  • 2李恩宽,白松涛.用腹腔镜手术联合胆道镜再手术治疗内外胆管结石的疗效观察[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(10):164-165. 被引量:3
  • 3鲁广恩,陈志军,周共庆,胡三元.腹腔镜治疗老年胆管结石25例体会[J].实用老年医学,2006,20(3):186-186. 被引量:1
  • 4杨云生,罗莹.不明原因消化道出血的概念及病因[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(6):400-401. 被引量:7
  • 5Senyuz OF,Gulsen F, Gokhan O,et al. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on intrahepatic biliary calculi developing after choledochal cyst surgery:A case report. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2015,26 ( 3 ):274-276.
  • 6Palermo M,Duza G,Caviglia ML,et al. Treatment of bile duet stones by lapamseopy,endoscopy or combined approaches. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam, 2015,45( 1 ):90-96.
  • 7方忠伟.腹腔镜联合胆管镜取石术治疗胆管结石的疗效观察.实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2014,22(11):113-114.
  • 8E1 Nakeeb A,Askr W,EI Handy E,et al. Long term outcomes of choledochoduodenostomy for common bile duct stones in the of laparoscopy and endoscopy.Hepatogastroenterology, 2015,62( 137):6-10.
  • 9Park JS,Jeong S,Han JY,et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. Dig Dis Sci,2014,59 (8):1898-1901.
  • 10Kenny R, Richardson J,McGlone ER,et al. Laparoscopic com- mon bile duct exploration versus pre or post-operative ERCP for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing cholecys- tectomy:is there any difference.Int J Surg,2014,12(9):989-993.

共引文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部