期刊文献+

吡柔比星热灌注联合化疗用于膀胱癌治疗的有效性研究 被引量:9

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察吡柔比星热灌注联合化疗用于膀胱癌治疗的临床效果,并评估其可行性。方法50例晚期膀胱癌患者,遵照随机原则分为甲组和乙组,每组25例。两组患者均给予吉西他滨+顺铂(GC)化疗方案,乙组在化疗基础上联合吡柔比星热灌注疗法。观察比较两组患者的临床疗效、治疗前及治疗90 d后的肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原125(CA125)]水平、治疗期间不良反应发生情况。结果治疗后,乙组患者的疾病控制率及总有效率分别为96.0%、76.0%,均明显高于甲组的68.0%、48.0%,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=6.640、4.160, P=0.010、0.041<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的CEA、CA19-9、CA125水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的CEA、CA19-9、CA125水平均明显低于治疗前,且乙组患者的CEA、CA19-9、CA125水平分别为(8.1±1.9)μg/L、(21.7±5.9)U/L、(22.2±3.2)U/L,均明显低于甲组的(13.9±3.3)μg/L、(35.3±5.2)U/L、(35.2±3.2)U/L,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。乙组不良反应发生率为24.0%(6/25),略高于甲组的20.0%(5/25),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.117, P=0.733>0.05)。结论吡柔比星热灌注疗法联合化疗对膀胱癌的疗效显著,能够明显降低患者的肿瘤标志物表达水平,且治疗过程相对安全,值得推广。
作者 乔新
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2019年第14期113-114,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1450
  • 2Von Der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisp latin in advanced on metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, random ized, multinational, multicenter phase Ⅲ study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2000,18(17) : 3068-3077.
  • 3Loehrer PJ Sr, Einhorn LH, Elson PJ, et al. A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1992,10(7): 1066-1073.
  • 4Von Der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005,23 (21) :4602-4608.
  • 5Adamo V,Magno C,Spitaleri G,et al. Phase Ⅱ study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: long-term follow-up of a 3-week regimen [J]. Oncology, 2005, 69 (5): 391 - 398.
  • 6Als AB,Sengelov L,Von Der Maase H. Gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer; 3- or 4-week schedule [J]? Acta Oncol, 2007,47 (1) : 110-119.
  • 7Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada [J]. J Natl Cancer lnst,2000,92:205 -216.
  • 8Sun JM,Ahn MJ,Park MJ,et al. Accuracy of RECIST I. 1 for non - small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhihitors [ J]. Lung cancer,2010,69 : 105 - 109.
  • 9Maringwa John T,Quinten Chantal,King Madeleine,Ringash Jolie,Osoba David,Coens Corneel,Martinelli Francesca,Vercauteren Jurgen,Cleeland Charles S,Flechtner Henning,Gotay Carolyn,Greimel Eva,Taphoorn Martin J,Reeve Bryce B,Koch Joseph Schmuck.Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer . 2010
  • 10洪卫,余新民,郭勇,张沂平,钟海均,范云,冯建国,马胜林.吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗复发转移性膀胱癌的Ⅱ期临床研究[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2008,23(2):175-177. 被引量:15

共引文献45

同被引文献76

引证文献9

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部