期刊文献+

加长柄假体翻修人工髋关节置换后假体柄周围骨折

The treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with lengthened stem prosthesis revision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨加长柄假体翻修人工髋关节置换后假体柄周围骨折的有效性和安全性。方法采用加长柄假体翻修术治疗21例Vancouver B型股骨假体周围骨折患者。观察手术时间、术中出血量、髋关节功能Harris评分、疼痛VAS评分和并发症发生情况。结果手术时间127~296 min,术中出血量428~1 240 ml。患者均获得随访,时间12~37个月。骨折均骨性愈合,无假体松动。下肢深静脉血栓1例,大腿外侧异位骨化1例。末次随访时,髋关节功能Harris评分为86分±6分,VAS评分为1.69分±0.59分。结论加长柄假体翻修术治疗Vancouver B型股骨假体周围骨折安全有效。 Objective To explore the clinical effectiveness and safety of the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after artificial hip replacement with lengthened stem prosthesis revision.Methods Twenty-one patients of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures were treated with non-cemented and lengthened stem prosthesis revision.The clinical outcome were assessed with surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,Harris score of hip function,pain VAS and complications.Results The operative time was from 127 min to 296 min.The intraoperative blood loss volume was 428~1 240 ml.All the patients received follow-up of 12~37 months.The fractures were all bony union,without prosthesis loosening.One patient suffered deep vein thrombosis and one patient suffered heterotopic ossification.At the final follow-up,the Harris score of hip function was 86±6 points,and VAS was 1.69±0.59 points.Conclusions Lengthened stem prosthesis revision provides good and safe outcomes in treating Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures.
作者 李长福 李二虎 范程 赵鹏 LI Chang-fu;LI Er-hu;FAN Cheng;ZHAO Peng(Dept of Traumatology,Xining No.1 People′s Hospital,Xining,Qinghai810000,China)
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2019年第4期421-423,共3页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 股骨假体周围骨折 VANCOUVER B型 加长柄假体 periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver type B lengthened stem prosthesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1张惠箴,蒋智铭.关节炎的病理诊断[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(6):368-371. 被引量:4
  • 2Spitzer Al.The cemented femoral stem:selecting the ideal patient[J].Orthopedic,2005,28:841-848.
  • 3陈述祥,刘彦.人工全髋关节翻修术的研究进展[J].中国娇形外科杂志,2012,23:2154-2156.
  • 4HughU.The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stemsin revision total hip arthroplasty[J].J Arthroplasty,2002,17:138-141.
  • 5Weiss RJ,Stark A,Karrholm J.A modular cementless stem vs.ce-mented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip:a popu-lation-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register[J].Acta 0rthop,2011,82:136-142.
  • 6Kang MN,Huddleston JI,Hwang K,et al.Early outcome of a modularfemoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty[J].J Arthroplas-ty,2008,23:220-225.
  • 7Lakstein D,Backstein D,Safir O,et al.Revision total hip arthroplastywith a porous-coated modular stem:5 to 10 years follow-up[J].Clin 0rthop,2010,468:1310-1315.
  • 8Kyoung HM,Kang JS,Lee SH,et al.Revision total hip arthroplasty u-sing an extensively porous coated femoral stem[J].Clin OrthopSurg,2009,1:105-109.
  • 9Kwong LM,Miller AJ,Lubinus P.A modular distal fixation option forproximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty:a 2-to 6-yearfollow-up study[J].J Arthroplasty,2003,3:94-97.
  • 10Salemyr MF,Skoldenberg OG,Bodin HG,et al.Good results with anuncemented proximally HA _ coated stem in hip revision surgery:62hips followed for 2-13 years[J].Acta Orthop,2008,79:184-193.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部