期刊文献+

高校图书馆服务创新再思考——基于排名评估体系中论文相关指标视角 被引量:6

Reflections on the Service Innovation of University Libraries——Based on the Perspective of the Paper Index in the Ranking and Evaluation Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在各大学、学科排名及学科评估体系中,学术论文相关指标是衡量机构科研水平的重要指标之一。本文通过对若干排名评估体系中的学术论文相关指标进行梳理,总结了共性和个性评价指标及计算方法,思考并讨论了高校图书馆提升论文相关指标、增强高校科研竞争力的具体措施,即关注跟踪本校论文数据表现、支持学校科研政策制定、积极参与自评并构建符合学科特色的学术成果合理评价体系。 Among the universities, disciplines rankings and disciplines evaluation systems, the indicators of academic papers are important indicators for measuring the scientific research level of institutions. Through combing the relevant indicators of academic papers in several ranking evaluation systems, summarizing the commonality and individuality evaluation indicators and calculation methods, this paper considers and discusses that university libraries should improve the relevant indicators of papers and enhance the competitiveness of scientific research in universities: focusing on and tracking the performance of papers in the universities ? supporting the formulation of scientific research policies, actively participating in self-evaluation and constructing a reasonable evaluation system for academic achievements in line with the characteristics of the discipline.
作者 陈思彤 Chen Sitong
出处 《图书馆工作与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第7期26-32,共7页 Library Work and Study
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“我校ESI学科发展现状评估及发展策略研究”(项目编号:3132016368)研究成果之一
关键词 学术论文 评价指标 图书馆服务 学科评价 排名体系 高校图书馆 Academic papers Evaluation index Library service Discipline evaluation Ranking system University library
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献105

  • 1黄唯.发挥高校图书馆的智库功能 推进本地企业发展[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(S1):147-149. 被引量:28
  • 2郭丽芳.评价论文学术质量的文献计量学指标探讨[J].现代情报,2005,25(3):11-12. 被引量:66
  • 3万锦堃,花平寰,孙秀坤.期刊论文被引用及其Web全文下载的文献计量分析[J].现代图书情报技术,2005(4):58-62. 被引量:82
  • 4Jensen M. The New Metrics of Scholarly Authority [J]. Chronicle of Higher Education,2007(41):B6.
  • 5Taraborelli D. Soft Peer Review ~ Social Software and Distribu ted Scientific Evaluation [ EB/OL]. [ 2015-02-05]. http:// www. mendeley, eom/researeh/soft-peer-review-soeial-soft- ware-and-dist ribut ed-seientifie-evaluation/.
  • 6Neylon C, Wu S. Ariele-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact[J]. PLoS Biology,2009(ll) :e1000242.
  • 7Patterson M. Article-level Metrics at PLoS-addition o~ Usage Data[J]. PLoS Blogs,2009(S. 1. ) :315-317.
  • 8Priem J, Hemminger B. H. Scientometrics 2. 0: New Metrics of Scholarly Impaet on the Social Web[J]. First Monday, 2010 (7).
  • 9Piwowar H. Introduction Altmetrics:What, Why and Where? [J]. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013 (4) ~ 8-9.
  • 10Lin J, Fenner M. Altmetrics in Evolution : Defining ~ Redefin- ing the Ontology of Article-level Metrics [J]. Information Standards Quarterly, 2013(2) : 20-26.

共引文献241

同被引文献99

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部