期刊文献+

对肝硬化门静脉高压症患者应激和免疫功能的影响 被引量:11

Effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization on stress and immune function in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术对肝硬化门静脉高压患者应激和免疫功能的影响。方法回顾性分析2015年6月至2017年6月河南省人民医院66例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者的临床资料,分为腹腔镜脾切除联合断流术(laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization, LSPD )组 29 例和开腹脾切除联合断流术(open splenectomy and pericardial devascularization,OSPD)组37例。结果 LSPD组血浆皮质醇浓度低于OSPD组(F分组=18. 85,P = 0.020),两组皮质醇的浓度随时间的延长先升高后降低(F时间=532.08 ,P = 0.000),LSPD组升高后降低的幅度大于OSPD组(F交互=24. 91 ,P =0. 000)。LSPD组CD3 +、CD4 *、CD4 +/CD8 +水平高于 OSPD 组,CD8 +水平低于 OSPD 组(F 分组=3.55,21. 47 J 54. 84,64. 29,P <0. 05),两组 CD3 +、CD4+、CD4+/CD8*的水平随时间的延长先降低后升高,CD8+先升高后降低(F时间=199.22、298. 48 ,864. 33,510. 23,P<0.05),LSPD 组 CD3 +、CD4+、CD4 +/CD84 降低后升高的幅度、CD8 +升高后降低的幅度大于OSPD组(F交互=19. 27、1& 21、79. 55、35. 21 ,P <0. 05)。两组在术后再出血、血栓形成、胃或食管屡、胰痿等方面差异无统计学意义(X2=0- 05,0. 67.0.07,0. 16,P = 0. 829,0.413.0. 789.0.693),但OSPD组术后胸腔、腹腔积液和术后脾热(体温〉38. 0℃,>3 d)情况较LSPD组严重&2=5.49、6.68』=0.019、0.010)。结论LSPD可以有效降低肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术后应激反应,促进免疫功能恢复,降低术后胸腔、腹腔积液和术后脾热的发生率。 Objective To evaluate the effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization( LSPD) vs. open procedure( OSPD) on stress and immune function in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis. Methods From June 2015 to June 2017 a total of 66 patients underwent LSPD or OSPD procedures. Results Plasma cortisol concentration in the LSPD group was lower than that in the OSPD group ( Fgroup = 18. 85 ,P =0. 020). Cortisol concentration in the two groups increased firstly and then decreased with time extension ( Ftime = 532. 08 , P = 0. 000 ). The level of CD3 +, CD4+, CD4 +/CD8 + in LSPD group was higher than that in OSPD group, and the level of CD8 + was lower than that in OSPD group ( Fgroup = 3. 55,21. 47, 154. 84,64. 29, P V 0. 05 ), the levels of CD3 +, CD4+ and CD4 +/CD8 + in the two groups first decreased and then increased with the extension of time, and the levels of CD8 + increased firstly and then decreased( Ftime = 199. 22, 29& 48, 864. 33, 510. 23 ,P < 0. 05 ), the increase range of CD3 +, CD4 +, and CD4 +/CD8 + in LSED group was higher than that in OSPD group (Finteraction = 19. 27 , 1& 21, 79. 55 , 35. 21, P V 0. 05 );there was no statistical significance in the complications such as: rebleeding, thrombosis and splenic fever in the two groups(x2 = 0. 05 , 0. 67 , 0. 07, 0. 16, P = 0. 829, 0. 413, 0. 789, 0. 693 ). But the postoperative chest/cavity effusion and fever (>38.0℃ and >3 days) is OSPD group is higher than in the LSPD group(x2=5. 49, 6. 68,P =0. 019, 0. 010). Conclusion LSPD effectively reduces postoperative stress, protects immune function ,decreases postoperative pleural and abdominal effusion and fever.
作者 代坤甫 马帅 郝晓沛 何雨婷 周涛 田广金 董亚东 余海波 Dai Kunfu;Ma Shuai;Hao Xiaopei;He Yuting;Zhou Tao;Tian Guangjin;Dong Yadong;Yu Haibo(Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, He'nan Provincial People's Hospital of He' nan University, Zhengzhou 450003, China)
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期609-612,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(201502018、2018020412) 河南省科技厅攻关项目(162102310021).
关键词 高血压 门静脉 氢化可的松 T淋巴细胞亚群 脾切除 Hypertension, portal Hydrocortisone T-lymphocytes subsets Splenectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献41

  • 1董瑞,杜锡林,王青,赵磊,李江斌,陈安,樊东,鲁建国.腹腔镜辅助小切口与传统开腹门静脉高压症手术的比较[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2012,5(5):43-46. 被引量:5
  • 2王汉宁,向国安,陈开运,马周和,高鹏,肖金丰,肖方联,谭敏.二级脾蒂离断法在腹腔镜脾切除术的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(9):691-692. 被引量:25
  • 3郑成竹,李际辉.中国肥胖病外科治疗指南(2007)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(10):759-762. 被引量:169
  • 4Feldman LS. Laparoscopic splenectomy: standardized approach [J]. World J Surg, 2011,35(7) :1487-1495.
  • 5Habermalz B, Sauerland S, Decker G, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(4) : 821-848.
  • 6Zhu JH, Wang YD, Ye ZY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009, 19 ( 3 ) :258-262.
  • 7Yao HS, Wang WJ, Wang Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial of vessel sealing system ( LigaSure ) in esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension[J]. Am J Surg, 2011,202( 1 ) : 82-90.
  • 8Shabahang H, Maddah G, Tavassoli A, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure or clip ligation? [ J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2012, 22(2) : 136-138.
  • 9Wu Z,Zhou J, Pankaj P, et al. Comparative treatment and literature review for laparoscopic splenectomy alone versus preoperative splenic artery embolization splenectomy [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26( 10): 2758-2766.
  • 10Swanson TW,Meneghetti AT, Sampath S, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: 20-year experience at a Canadian centre [ J ]. Can J Surg, 2011,54(3) : 189-193.

共引文献94

同被引文献121

引证文献11

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部