超声乳化手术与小切口非超声乳化手术治疗白内障临床疗效及安全性分析

Clinical Effect and Safety Analysis of Phacoemulsification and Small Incision Non-phacoemulsification on Cataract

目的研究比对在治疗白内障疾病中采取小切口非超声乳化和超声乳化手术的临床安全性和疗效。方法此文分析的样本取值时间是2016年4月至2018年4月,收入样本是70例白内障患者,分组方法是随机法,参照组的35例患者行超声乳化手术,实验组的35例患者行小切口非超声乳化手术,分析对比经不同手术治疗后两组白内障患者组间对比差异。结果实验组和参照组术后1天、术后7天、术后1个月的视力对比术前,P<0.05,统计学展现组间验证参比意义;参照组白内障患者临床治疗有效率合计值低于实验组数据,并发症发生率高于实验组数据,实验组的优势更显著,P<0.05,统计学展现组间验证参比意义。结论将小切口非超声乳化和超声乳化手术应用治疗白内障疾病中的效果都相对较好,但小切口非超声乳化手术更值得应用。

Objective to research and compare clinical safety and effect of small incision non-phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification in treatment of cataract.Methods collect 70 cases cataract patients from April 2016 to April 2018 as study samples.With random grouping method,35 cases in control group were treated with phacoemulsification,and 35 cases in experimental group with small incision non-phacoemulsification.Analyze and compare differences between two groups after different operations.Results visual acuity at 1 day,7 days and 1 month after operation showed statistical significance between before and after operation for experimental and control group,P<0.05.Total effective rate of clinical treatment of control group was lower than experimental group,complications incidence was higher than experimental group,experimental group has more significant advantages,with statistical significance between two groups,P<0.05.Conclusion both small incision non-phacoemulsification and phacoemulsification have relatively effect in treatment of cataract diseases,but small incision non-phaco emulsification is more worthy of application.