期刊文献+

买方市场势力对下游企业产品质量创新激励的影响 被引量:3

Impact of Buyers’ Market Power on Innovation Incentives of Product Quality in Downstream Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建了由垄断制造商和下游寡头竞争企业组成的纵向产品质量差异化模型考察下游生产高质量产品的大规模企业在具有市场势力前后各交易主体的质量创新激励问题和市场均衡结果的变化情况.研究表明当下游不同质量水平的企业均无市场势力时任何一方的产品质量提升均会激励其竞争对手的创新积极性当下游大规模企业具有市场势力且与上游制造商进行合作谈判时下游两家企业的批发价格和零售价格均随市场势力的增强而有所降低.与此同时合作谈判交易模式前后下游两家企业的批发价格、零售价格以及市场销量的变化情况均取决于买方市场势力的大小而小规模企业的市场销量与利润收益始终保持不变. A vertical product quality differentiation model consisting of monopolistic manufacturers and downstream oligarchic competitors was constructed. Based on this model, the changes in quality-innovating incentives and market equilibrium results were investigated before and after the downstream large-scale enterprises with high-quality products had market power. Research showed that when downstream enterprises at different quality levels all have no market power, the quality promotion of any party will stimulate the innovation enthusiasm of its competitors. When a downstream large-scale enterprise has market power and negotiates with an upstream manufacturer, the wholesale prices and the retail prices of the two downstream enterprises will decline with the increase of market power. At the same time, the wholesale prices, retail prices and market sales of the two downstream companies all depend on buyers’ market power while the sales and profitability of small-scale enterprises remain unchanged.
作者 郭晓玲 李凯 农蓓 GUO Xiao-ling;LI Kai;NONG Bei(School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China;Product Operations Department, China Union Pay, Shanghai 200080, China)
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第8期1197-1204,共8页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472032,71873026)
关键词 买方市场势力 BERTRAND竞争 质量创新 创新激励 合作谈判 buyers’ market power Bertrand competition quality innovation innovation incentive cooperation negotiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1赵德余,顾海英,刘晨.双寡头垄断市场的价格竞争与产品差异化策略——一个博弈论模型及其扩展[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(5):1-7. 被引量:40
  • 2Brocas I. Vertical integration and incentives to innovate[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21 (4): 457-488.
  • 3Buehler S, Schmutzler A. Intimidating competitors: Endogenous vertical integration and downstream investment in successive oligopoly[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2008, 26(1): 247-265.
  • 4Chen Y, David E. Innovation in vertically related markets[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2010, 58(2): 373-401.
  • 5Shaked A, Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1982, 49(1): 3-13.
  • 6Economides N. Quality choice and vertical integration[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1999, 17(6): 903-914.
  • 7Singer M, Donoso P, Traverso P. Quality strategies in supply chain alliances of disposal items[J]. Omega: Internationnal Journal of Management, 2003, 31(3): 499-509.
  • 8Heeb R. Innovation and vertical integration in complementary markets[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2003, 12(3): 387-417.
  • 9Chen Z. Dominant retailers and the countervailing power hypothesis[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2003, 34(4) : 612-625.
  • 10Inderst R, Wey C. How strong buyers spur upstream innovation[ J]. London: London School of Economics, 2005: 1-36.

共引文献12

同被引文献49

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部