期刊文献+

启蒙辩证法——对启蒙精神的批判

Enlightenment Dialectics——Critique of the Enlightenment Spirit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 霍克海默和阿多诺率先对启蒙进行了批判,成为西方马克思主义批判的先锋者和领军者,以历史和现实的双向角度对启蒙进行考察,从而质疑启蒙转向对发达工业社会极权主义性质的批判,从对启蒙的目标反思到对人现实困境的批判,从资本主义一体化进而到对资本主义自反性批判,霍克海默和阿多诺使启蒙的背反性在资本主义工业文明下的丑陋面孔暴露在大众面前,这是西方世界话语体系的核心所在。启蒙精神贯穿西方资本主义的发展也为中国现代化道路发展提供了历史借鉴。 Horkheimer and Adorno took the lead in criticizing the Enlightenment and became the pioneer and leader of the Western Marxist critique. They examined the enlightenment from the two-way perspective of history and reality, thus questioning the enlightenment turn to the totalitarian nature of developed industrial society. The critique was from the reflection of the goal of enlightenment to the critique of the real dilemma of man and from the integration of capitalism to the reflexive criticism of capitalism. Horkheimer and Adorno exposed the ugly face of enlightenment in the industrial civilization of capitalist society to the public. This is the core of the discourse system of the Western world. The enlightenment spirit runs through the development of Western capitalism and provides a historical reference for the development of Chinese modernization.
作者 栾青 韩秋红 Luan Qing;Han Qiuhong(School of Marxism, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)
出处 《齐鲁师范学院学报》 2019年第4期95-100,共6页 Journal of Qilu Normal University
关键词 启蒙辩证法 神话 启蒙精神 Enlightenment Dialectics Mythology Enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p xiv.
  • 2Jurgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1995, p.118.
  • 3霍耐特.《权力的批判--批判社会理论反思的几个阶段》,上海:上海人民出版社,2012年,第49-52页和第95页.
  • 4Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic oJ Enlightenment." Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stantbrd: Stantord University Press, 2002, p.22, p.23.
  • 5Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p,65.
  • 6Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p.24.
  • 7Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p27.
  • 8Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund J1hcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p29,p.26.
  • 9Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p.29,p.65.
  • 10Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo, Dialectic of Enlightenment." Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002, p.71, p.67, p.70.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部