期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术临床疗效分析 被引量:16

The Clinical Effect of Total Hysterectomy with Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨单孔腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的安全性及效果。方法 回顾性分析我院2017年1月~2018年4月行腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的87例患者的临床资料,按不同腹腔镜入路及阴道断端缝合方法分为三组:A组30例,采用单孔腹腔镜手术经阴道缝合阴道断端;B组20例,采用单孔腹腔镜手术经腹腔镜缝合阴道断端;C组37例,采用传统腹腔镜手术经腹腔镜缝合阴道断端。比较三组患者术中出血量,手术时间,术后疼痛评分,恢复排气时间,首次离床活动时间,引流管留置时间,并发症发生率,术后住院时间及费用等临床指标。结果 三组患者手术顺利,术中均无并发症发生,无一例转开腹手术。单孔腹腔镜组均未额外添加操作孔。A组手术时间与C组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),但B组手术时间明显长于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A、B组患者术后排气时间、首次离床活动时间明显早于C组,术后48 h内各时点VAS评分低于C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但术中出血量、引流管留置时间、住院时间及住院费用与C组比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术具有术后疼痛轻、恢复快、美观等优势,是一种安全有效的手术方法,值得临床推广应用。阴道断端的缝合可依术者经验灵活选择。 Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of total hysterectomy with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS).Methods A retrospective review of 87 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy from January 2017 to April 2018 in our hospital was carried out.According to the different methods of laparoscopic approach and vaginal end suturing,87 cases were divided into three groups: 30 cases of group A were performed LESS and vaginal edge suturing to closure;20 cases of group B were performed LESS and vaginal edge suturing under laparoscope;37 cases of group C were performed total hysterectomy and vaginal end suturing by three-holes laparoscopy.The bleeding volume,operation time,post-operative pain scores,recovery time of exhaust,first off-bed activity time,indwelling time of drainage tube,incidence of complications,hospitalization time and cost were compared among the three groups.Results All cases accomplished the operation successfully without intra-operative complications and no conversion to open surgery.No additional operation holes were added in the group A and B.There was no significant difference in operation time between group A and group C (P>0.05),but the operation time was longer in group B than that in group C (P<0.05).The exhaust time and the first off-bed activity time was earlier and the VAS scores of different time points within 48h were lower in group A and B than those in group C (P<0.05),but there was no statistical difference in intra-operative blood loss,indwelling time of drainage tube,hospitalization time and cost(P>0.05).Conclusions LESS is a safe and effective procedure for total hysterectomy with the advantages of mild post-operative pain,quick recovery and beautiful appearance,and it is worthy of extensive clinical application.The suture of the vaginal stump can be flexibly selected according to the experience of the surgeon.
作者 王晓樱 李妍 WANG Xiao-ying;LI Yan(Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,Liaoning,China)
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2019年第3期215-219,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
关键词 单孔腹腔镜检查 全子宫切除术 疼痛 laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) total hysterectomy pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, et al. Cos- mesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 1998,12 ( 11 ) : 1334-1340.
  • 2Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, et al. Functional out-come, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparpscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy : a comparative study [ J ]. Dis Colon Rec- tum, 2001,44 ( 12 ) : 1800-1807.
  • 3Eshuis EJ,Polle SW,Slors JF,et al. Long-term surgical re- currence, morbidity, quality of life, and body image of lapa- roscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn "s disease : a comparative study [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51 (6) :858-867.
  • 4Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim C J, et al. Single port access laparo- scopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparocopic ad- nexal surgery. A comparison of perioperative outcomes [ J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol, 2010 ( 5 ) : 181-184.
  • 5Koyanagi T, Motomura S, Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery:application to laparpscopically assis- ted vaginal hysterectomy [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2011, 283 ( 2 ) :305-309.
  • 6Phongnarisom C, Chinthakanano O. Transumbilieal single- incision laparoseopic hysterectomy with conventional lapa- roscopic instruments in patients with symptomatic leiomyo- ma and/or adenomyosis [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2010, 284(4) :893-900.
  • 7Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizaielli G, et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for bening adnexal disease:a random- ized trial [ J ]. Fertil Steri1,2011,96 ( 1 ) 255. e1-259, e2.
  • 8Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, et al. A randomized propective study of single-port and four approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2011,25 ( 8 ) : 2462-2469.
  • 9Hoyer-sorensen C, Vistad I, Ballard K. Is single-port lapa- roscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than con- ventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized con- trolled trial[ J]. Fertil Steril,2012,98(4) :973-979.
  • 10Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, et al. Single-port-access lapa- roscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus convention- al laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy:a compari- son of perioperative outcomes [J]. Surg Endosc, 2010,24 (9) :2248-2252.

共引文献136

同被引文献142

引证文献16

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部