期刊文献+

炎症性肠病病人自我管理行为量表的编制及信效度检验 被引量:36

Development and reliability and validity test of self-management behavior scale for patients with inflammatory bowel disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]编制可客观评价炎症性肠病病人自我管理行为的量表,并进行信效度检验。[方法]通过文献回顾、半结构式访谈、专家咨询及小样本预调查形成炎症性肠病病人自我管理行为量表初稿。选取江苏省3所三级甲等医院160例炎症性肠病病人进行调查,并进行信效度检验,形成最终量表。[结果]最终确定的炎症性肠病病人自我管理行为量表包括用药管理、饮食管理、疾病监测、情绪管理、运动管理、日常生活管理、资源利用7个维度,共36个条目,量表的总体Cronbach's α系数为0.945,各维度Cronbach's α系数分别为0.788,0.864,0.722,0.872,0.804,0.805,0.741,折半信度为0.810,重测信度为0.929,各维度重测信度为0.722~0.891;总量表的内容效度指数为0.926;校标关联效度为0.689;探索性因子分析提取7个公因子,累计贡献率为62.809%。[结论]构建的炎症性肠病病人自我管理行为量表信效度良好,可作为临床评估炎症性肠病病人自我管理行为的有效工具。 Objective:To develop a self-management behavior scale for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and test its reliability and validity.Methods:Literature review,semi-structured interviews,expert consultations,and small sample pretest were used to identify the draft of the scale.A total of 160 IBD patients were investigated in three Tertiary Grade A hospitals in Jiangsu province.And the reliability and validity of scale were tested,then the final scale was developed.Results:The final self-administered behavior scale for patients with IBD included 36 items in 7 dimensions: medication management,diet management,disease monitoring,emotion management,exercise management,daily life management,and resource utilization.The total scale's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.945,and each dimension's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.788,0.864,0.722,0.872,0.804,0.805,and 0.741.The split-half coefficient was 0.810. The total scale's test-retest coefficient was 0.929,and each dimension's test-retest coefficient ranged from 0.722 to 0.891.The content validity index was 0.926 and the criterion validity coefficient was 0.689.The exploratory factor analysis extracted 7 common factors,and the cumulative contribution rate was 62.809%.Conclusion:The self-management behavior scale was proved to be reliable and valid, and it could be used as an effective tool for clinical evaluation of self-management behavior of IBD patients.
作者 尚星辰 林征 卞秋桂 王美峰 林琳 张红杰 SHANG Xingchen;LIN Zheng;BIAN Qiugui;WANG Meifeng;LIN Lin;ZHANG Hongjie(School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu 211166 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2019年第14期2374-2380,共7页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 江苏省“六大人才高峰”第十二批高层次人才选拔培养资助项目,编号:WSW-030 “十三五”江苏省重点学科项目,编号:苏教研〔2016〕9号 江苏省高校优势学科建设工程三期项目立项学科“护理学”,编号:苏政办发〔2018〕87号
关键词 炎症性肠病 自我护理 自我管理行为 量表 信度 效度 inflammatory bowel disease self-care self-management behavior scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1高翔,胡品津,何瑶,廖山婴,彭穗,陈旻湖.炎症性肠病患者血清中自身抗体检测的临床意义[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(6):428-430. 被引量:39
  • 2刘思德,姜泊,周殿元.放大内镜结合黏膜染色技术诊断溃疡性结肠炎——附116例放大内镜形态分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2005,10(2):116-118. 被引量:8
  • 3李亚红,韩英,吴开春.炎症性肠病危险因素的流行病学调查研究[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2006,15(2):161-162. 被引量:19
  • 4Polit, DF, Beck, CT. the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Research in Nursing& Health, 2006,29,489-497.
  • 5Lynn . MR Determination and quantification of content validify [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35(6) :382-385.
  • 6Davis, LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. Applied Nursing Research, 1992, 5(4): 194-197.
  • 7Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing &Health, 2007,30,459-467.
  • 8Grant, JS, Davis, LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20, 269-274.
  • 9Waltz, CF. Strickland, O. , & Lenz, E. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. 2005. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20-69.
  • 10Germano EM,MeUo MJG,Sena DF,et al. Incidence and risk factors of corneal epithelial defects in mechanically ventilated children [J]. Crit Care Med, 2009,37(3 ) : 1 097-1 100.

共引文献778

同被引文献325

引证文献36

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部