期刊文献+

科西克辩证法视野中的“现实”

The "Reality" in Karel Kosik’s Dialectics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科西克辩证法把握社会历史现实的路径,至少奠基于两个要素:德国观念论的认知建构主义和马克思从抽象上升到具体的辩证法。一方面,科西克对“现实”概念的理解和康德所提出的“物自体”概念相关,但是他对这个概念进行了历史唯物主义改造,认为“现实”是作为主体感性实践活动结果的社会历史现实。另一方面,受康德所开创的认知建构主义的影响,科西克认为社会历史现实是可以被认识的,认识工具就是马克思“从抽象上升到具体”的辩证法。在此基础上,科西克运用从抽象上升到具体的辩证法分析当代资本主义社会。在科西克看来,资本主义社会的功利主义实践造就的日常思维所揭示的只是作为现实非本质结构的“伪具体”,而劳动群众只有在批判的、革命的实践中形成辩证思维,才能打破伪具体,最终实现对社会历史现实的科学把握,即揭示作为现实本质结构的“具体总体”。总之,在科西克看来,“伪具体”的世界和“具体总体”的世界都是人们对现实进行建构的结果,但只有后者才在科学的基础上把握了现实的本质结构,尽管如此,打破“伪具体”和树立“具体的总体”却是同一个过程。 This paper explores the approaches to grasping social and historical reality with Karel Kosik’s dialectics based on both the cognitive constructivism of German idealism and Marx’s dialectics of ascending from the abstract to the concrete.Kosik’s conception of“reality”is related to Kant’s view of thing in itself.However,Kosik transformed it from the perspective of historical materialism,regarding“reality”to be the social and historical reality as the result of perceptual practice of subjects.Following Kant’s cognitive constructivism,Kosik contends that social and historical reality can be cognized and Marxist dialectics of ascending from the abstract to the concrete is the approach to such cognition.In analyzing contemporary capitalist society by such approach,Kosik claims that the“pseudo-concrete”unveiled by the daily thinking caused by the utilitarian practice is merely the nonessential structure of reality.Only with the dialectical thinking of the working masses forged in critical and revolutionary practice can the pseu-concrete be destroyed and the essence of the social and historical reality,namely the concrete totality in Kosik’s terminology,be ultimately grasped.In a word,both the pseu-concrete and the concrete totality are the results of humankind’s construction of reality,with only the concrete totality grasping the essence of reality in a scientific manner.Nonetheless,for Kosik,to destroy the pseu-concrete and establish the concrete totality fall in the same process.
作者 员俊雅 YUAN Jun-ya
出处 《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第4期19-25,191,共8页 Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金 中国社会科学院创新工程项目“马克思主义哲学中国化的进程与意义研究”(项目编号:2017ZXSCX05)的阶段性成果
关键词 德国观念论 马克思 科西克 辩证法 German idealism Marx Karel Kosik dialectics
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Karl Marx. Capital: A Critique of Political Econo- my: n. 3 [M]. trans, by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, New York: International Publishers, 1967: 372.
  • 2Marx's letter to Lassalle: dated London, 28 April 1862[M]//Marx-Engels Collected Works: Volume 41. New York: International Publishers:356.
  • 3Marx's letter to Engels, 28 Apr. 1862, in Marx-En- gels Collected Works, Volume 41, pp. 353-354.
  • 4Giambattista Vico. On the Most Ancient Wisdom of the Italians[M]. trans, by Jason Taylor, with an in- troduction by Robert Miner. New Haven: Yale Uni- versity Press, 2010.
  • 5The New Science of Giambattista Vico[M]. trans. by T. G. Bergin and M. H. Fisch, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970 : 52-53.
  • 6Kant. Critique of Pure Reason[M]. trans. Paul Gu- yer and Allen Wood. New York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press,1998.
  • 7Robert Paul Wolf. Kanfs Theory of Mental Activity: A Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.
  • 8Isaiah Berlin. Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas[M]. London: Chatto and Windus, 1976:130-131.
  • 9Marx, Engels. Wir kennen nur eine einzige Wissen- sehaft, die Wissenschaft der Gesehiehte[M] // Marx- Engels Werke: vol. III. Berlin: Dietz Verlag:18.
  • 10Isaiah Berlin, Vico and Herder, Two Studies in the History of Ideas, London: Chatto and Windus, 1976 年,第99页.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部