期刊文献+

F6半硬性细输尿管镜联合Ntrap在输尿管上段结石中的应用 被引量:4

F6 semi-rigid ureteroscope combined with Ntrap basket for the treatment of proximal ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨F6半硬性细输尿管镜联合结石捕获器(Ntrap)在输尿管上段结石碎石中的应用价值及其可行性。方法:回顾性分析37例输尿管上段结石患者,术中因F9.8标准输尿管镜无法上行而改用F6半硬性细输尿管镜联合Ntrap及更换200μm钬激光光纤进行碎石治疗的效果。结果:37例输尿管结石单次碎石成功率为91.9%(34/37),术中未发生输尿管穿孔或撕脱等严重并发症。随访1~3个月,1个月结石排净率为97.1%(33/34),无输尿管狭窄发生。结论:F6半硬性细输尿管镜更换200μm钬激光光纤联合Ntrap是标准输尿管镜无法上行碎石的最佳补救措施,Ntrap可有效防止结石上移,明显提高碎石成功率。 Objective:To explore the application value and feasibility of F6 semi-rigid ureteroscope combined with Ntrap basket for the treatment of proximal ureteral calculi.Method:We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 37 patients failed to be inserted the F9.8 standard ureteroscope.They were transferred to be used F6 fine semi-rigid ureteroscope combined with Ntrap basket and 200μm holmium laser fiber during the procedure.Result:The immediate success rate was 91.9%(34/37)among the 37 cases.No severe complications in terms of ureteral perforation or avulsion occurred during the procedure.During the follow-up period of 1-3 months,the stone free rate at 1 month was 97.1%(33/34),and no ureteral stricture was observed.Conclusion:F6 fine semirigid ureteroscope combined with Ntrap basket and 200μm holmium laser fiber is the best remedy when the standard ureteroscope failed to be inserted,which is effective in prevention of stone retropulsion and could significantly improve the success rate of fragmentation.
作者 王路加 茅善华 吴忠 丁强 高鹏 WANG Lujia;MAO Shanhua;WU Zhong;DING Qiang;GAO Peng(Department of Urology,Huashan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai,200040,China)
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2019年第7期565-567,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 输尿管结石 输尿管镜 钬激光 Ntrap ureteral calculi ureteroscope holmium laser Ntrap
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1A1-Assiri M, Al-Otaibi M F, Sircar K, et al. Renal pelvis squamous cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in a tuberculous kidney[J]. Scientific World Journal, 2004, 4:965-968.
  • 2Markni S K,Charri C, Ellouze S, et al. Mucinous tu- bular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney associat- ed with tuberculosis[J]. Saudi Kidney Dis Traspl, 2011, 22(2):335-336.
  • 3Hendrikx A J, Strijbos W E, de Knijff D W, et al. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones:SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study I-J]. J Endourol, 1999,13(10) :727-733.
  • 4Peschel R, Janetschek G, Bartsch G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal u- reteral calculi: a prospective randomized study[J]. J Urol, 1999,162(6): 1909-1912.
  • 5Islam M, Malik A. Ureteroscopic pneumatic versus ex- tracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones[-J]. J Coil Physicians Surg Pak, 2012, 22(7): 444-447.
  • 6Arrabal-Polo M A, Arrabal-Martin M, Mijdn-Ortiz J L, et al. Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium, YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy[J]. BJU Int, 2009,104 (8), 1144-1147.
  • 7Zhang J, Shi Q, Wang G Z, et al. Cost-effectiveness a- nalysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in east- ern China[J]. Urol Int, 2011, 86(4), 470-475.
  • 8Salem H K. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi[-J]. Urolo- gy, 2009, 74(6) :1216-1221.
  • 9Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, et al. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the manage- ment of large, proximal ureteral stones, a randomized clinical trial [J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22 (12) . 2677 - 2680.
  • 10Lee Y H, Tsai J Y, Jiaan B P, et al. Prospective ran- domized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ure- teroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones[J]. Urology, 2006, 67 (3) : 480- 484.

共引文献54

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部