The Comparative Analysis on Country Park Management between Hong Kong and Beijing

香港、北京郊野公园管理的对比研究（英文）

With a comparatively mature state of country park development for China, Hong Kong serves as a model that is emulated by many cities in China's Mainland. In contrast, Beijing started to establish country parks relatively late, but along with the nascent 'Country Park Loop', achieving scientific and reasonable operation management is now the major challenge facing Beijing. By comparing the differences between Hong Kong and Beijing country park management in terms of positioning, management organization, legal guarantees, supporting facilities and education, this paper explores the factors of social development stage, urban developmental history and planning, the wilderness concept and financial support which are responsible for those differences. In order to achieve sustainable development, this paper shows that Beijing country parks should seek corresponding solutions according to their own characteristics.

香港作为我国郊野公园发展较为成熟的地区,是国内众多城市学习效仿的对象。而起步较晚的北京,随着'郊野公园环'建设初具规模,面临的巨大挑战就是如何对郊野公园进行科学有效的运营和管理。通过对比香港与北京郊野公园在功能定位、管理组织、法律保障、配套设施、科普教育等方面的差异,指出社会发展阶段、城市发展历史与规划、荒野理念和资金支持是二者不同的主要原因,同时强调为实现可持续发展,北京郊野公园要根据自身特点,寻求对应的解决策略。