期刊文献+

社区老年人群膳食中锰摄入水平与痴呆发病风险的关联研究 被引量:2

Relationship between Dietary Manganese Intake and Incidence Risk of Dementia in Community Elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨社区老年人膳食中锰摄入量与痴呆发病风险间的关联。方法纳入1 483例符合入选标准的上海市静安区社区老年居民,平均随访5.3年。根据基线膳食频率问卷计算锰日均摄入量,将研究对象按照锰日均摄入量分为:<3.2 mg·d^-1组、3.2~3.7 mg·d^-1组、3.7~4.16 mg·d^-1组和> 4.6 mg·d^-1组。依据美国精神病协会精神障碍与统计手册(DSM-IV)确立痴呆诊断。使用COX多因素比例风险模型比较不同锰摄入量对痴呆发生风险的影响。结果锰日均摄入量由低至高的4组痴呆年发病率依次为2.61%、1.21%、0.65%和0.91%(P <0.001)。与锰日均摄入量3.7~4.16 mg·d^-1组比较,锰日均摄入量> 4.16 mg·d^-1组人群痴呆发病风险较高(HR=2.54)。在锰摄入量较低的两个组痴呆发病风险也有增高的趋势(<3.2 mg·d^-1,HR=1.81;3.2~3.7 mg·d^-1,HR=1.52)。结论膳食中锰摄入量与痴呆发病间存在U型效应曲线,社区老年人日常生活中锰摄入量过高或过低都可能增加痴呆发病风险。 Aim To explore the association between dietary manganese intake and the risk of dementia in community elderly.Methods 1483 people who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited,and were followed for averagely 5.3 years.The average daily intake of manganese was calculated by Dietary Frequency Questionnaire.Study subjects were divided into four groups by daily manganese intake: a ≤3.2 mg·d^-1 group,a( 3.2-3.7) mg·d^-1 group,a( 3.7-4.16) mg·d^-1 group,a > 4.16 mg·d^-1 group.Dementia was diagnosed by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Ⅳ.Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the effects of different manganese intakes on the risk of dementia.Results The annual incidence rates of dementia in 4 groups with average daily intake of manganese from low to high were 2.61%,1.21%,0.65% and 0.91%( P < 0.001).Subgroup with daily average intake of manganese greater than 4.16 mg·d^-1 had a higher dementia risk( HR = 2.54) than the control group( with daily average intake of 3.7 mg·d^-1 to 4.16 mg·d^-1).The estimated HRs for the two groups with lower manganese intake have the same trend(< 3.2 mg·d^-1,HR =1.81;3.2-3.7 mg·d^-1,HR = 1.52).Conclusion The association between dietary manganese intake and dementia incidence risk may be a U-shaped curve.Community elderly who intake too much or too little high-manganese foods might have higher risk of dementia.
作者 张晨博 罗剑锋 丁玎 赵倩华 梁小妞 吴婉清 王飞 郭起浩 洪震 ZHANG Chen-bo;LUO Jian-feng;DING Ding;ZHAO Qian-hua;LlANG Xiao-niu;WU Wan-qing;WANG Fei;GUO Qi-hao;HONG Zhen(Departmentof Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;School of Public Health and Key Laboratory ofPublic Health Safety,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Department of Neurology,Huashan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 200040,China)
出处 《中国临床神经科学》 2019年第4期429-435,共7页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Neurosciences
关键词 痴呆 膳食 营养 dementia manganese dietary nutrient
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献105

  • 1彭迎春,常文虎,沈艳红.如何测量问卷的信度[J].中华医院管理杂志,2004,20(6):383-384. 被引量:60
  • 2王海军,徐克静.问卷调查中的信度和效度问题[J].中国健康教育,1994,10(11):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 3王光亚.食物成分表[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.4-6.
  • 4Becher H. The concept of residual confounding in regression models and some applications. Stat Med, 1992,11 : 1747-58.
  • 5Brenner H ,Bletmer M. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research. Epidemiology, 1997,8:429 -34.
  • 6Frank E., Harrell J. Regression Modeling Strategies with applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis: Springer,2001.
  • 7Stone CJ, Koo CY. Additive splines in statisties. In Proceedings of the statistical Computing Section ASA. Washington DC, 1985.
  • 8Hastie TJ,Tibshirani RJ. Generalized Additive Models:Chapman & Hall/ CRC, 1990.
  • 9Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives m categorical analysis. Epidemiology, 1995,6:356-65.
  • 10Weinberg CR. How bad is Categorization? Epidemiology, 1995,6 : 345- 347.

共引文献289

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部