期刊文献+

论我国反垄断法之宽恕待遇的完善 被引量:3

On the Improvement of Lenient Treatment in China’s Anti-monopoly Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 竞争和垄断相辅相生,竞争使价格趋近成本,经营者可图之利润变薄。为停止或暂缓彼此间的竞争,经营者倾向于用隐蔽的方式达成垄断协议,这严重损害了正常的市场交易和竞争。为解决垄断协议的隐蔽性导致执法机构取证难这一问题,宽恕制度应运而生。但由于我国现行法律对宽恕制度的规定过于原则和概括,且先前多层次的反垄断执法及各规章适用上的差异,尤其是宽恕待遇的设置不合理和不统一,极大地影响了宽恕制度发挥作用。宽恕制度的有效实施,依赖于宽恕制度本身的合理性。因此,若要不断地完善宽恕制度,须设定合理的宽恕待遇,以期更好地发挥宽恕制度在反垄断法实施中的重要作用。 Competition brings prices closer to costs and reduces managers' profits.In order to stop or postpone competition,operators tend to reach monopoly agreements in a covert way,which seriously damages normal market transactions and competition.The concealment of monopoly agreements makes it difficult for law enforcement agencies to obtain evidence.To solve this problem,the leniency program came into being.However,the Anti-monopoly law about the leniency program is so principled and generalized,and due to the conflict between the multilevel anti-monopoly law enforcement and the application of various rules,especially the irrational and inconsistent setting of the lenient treatment,greatly damage to the leniency program.The effective implementation of the leniency program depends on the rationality of the leniency program.Therefore,it is necessary to constantly improve the leniency program and set reasonable lenient treatment in order to better play an important role of the leniency program in the implementation of anti-monopoly law.
作者 高艳杰 Gao Yanjie(Law School,Anhui University of Finance&Economic,Bengbu,Anhui 233030,China)
出处 《黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版)》 2019年第8期87-92,共6页 Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
关键词 反垄断法 宽恕制度 宽恕待遇 Anti-monopoly Law Leniency Program lenient treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献116

  • 1游钰.反垄断法价值论[J].法制与社会发展,1998,4(6):27-31. 被引量:44
  • 2OECD. Hard Core Cartels. http ://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/39/63/2752129, pdf. 2005 - 06 - 30.
  • 3[美]马歇尔ooooCo霍华德.美国反托拉斯法与贸易法规-典型问题与案例分析[M].孙南申.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
  • 4John M. Connor. Global Antitrust Prosecutions of Modem International Cartels. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 2004, 4(3) :250.
  • 5Scott D. Harmmond. Detecting and deterring cartel activity through an effective leniency policy//The International Workshop on Cartels, Brighton, England, November 21 - 22,2000. http ://www. usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/9928.pdf. 2007 - 06 - 25.
  • 6Switgard Feuerstein. Collusion in industrial economics A survey. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2005,5 (3/ 4) :190.
  • 7Jose Apes teguia, Martin Dufwenberg, Reinhard Selten. Blowing the whistle[ J ]. Economic Theory , 2007, ( 31 ) : 157.
  • 8[美]道格拉斯G·拜尔,罗伯特H·格特纳,兰德尔C·皮克.法律的博弈分析[M].严旭阳.北京:法律出版社,1999.
  • 9Jason D Medinger. Antitrust leniency programs: A call for increased harmonization as proliferating undermine deterrence. Emory Law journal. Summer 2003, Vol. 52 (3) : 1464 - 1465.
  • 10Christopher R. Leslie. Antitrust Amnesty, Game Theory, and Cartel Stability. Journal of Corporation Law. Winter 2006, 31 (2) :461 -463.

共引文献75

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部