期刊文献+

基于CoI模型的混合式教学多元评价机制研究 被引量:10

Research on Multi-evaluation Mechanism of Blended Teaching Based on CoI Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在“互联网+”时代,传统的只关注考试分数的量化教学评价方式已不能满足教学的需求,混合式教学模式需要多元评价机制来辅助。基于CoI模型的混合式教学多元评价机制,以多元评价的教学原则为理论依据,通过认知存在、教学存在和社会存在三个维度,对混合式教学过程进行综合评价,促进线上和线下学习的翻转与融合。 In the "Internet +"era,the traditional quantitative teaching evaluation method that only pays attention to the test scores can no longer meet the needs of teaching. The blended teaching mode requires multiple evaluation mechanisms to assist.The multi-evaluation mechanism of blended teaching based on CoI mode is set up by means of the.
作者 冯冰清 FENG Bingqing(Basic Education College of Guangdong Teachers College of Foreign Language and Arts,Guangzhou,Guangdong,510507,P.R.China)
出处 《广东第二师范学院学报》 2019年第4期14-19,共6页 Journal of Guangdong University of Education
基金 广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划课题“高师院校与中小学合作的教师教育一体化模式研究”(2016GZGJ61) 广东省外语艺术职业学院2018年专项课题“混合式教学模式在英语教学法课程的应用研究”(2018ZX02)
关键词 多元评价机制 混合式教学 CoI模型 multiple evaluation mechanisms blended teaching CoI model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献83

  • 1申仁洪,黄甫全.合作活动学习刍论[J].教育研究,2004,25(10):60-63. 被引量:31
  • 2付强.基于网络的协作问题解决学习活动模式探析[J].现代远距离教育,2005(5):43-46. 被引量:17
  • 3刁维国.传统教学模式与现代教学模式的分野[J].教学与管理(理论版),2006(12):11-12. 被引量:15
  • 4杨南昌.基于设计的研究:正在兴起的学习研究新范式[J].中国电化教育,2007(5):6-10. 被引量:64
  • 5Wegerif, R. Towards a Dialogic Understanding of the Relationship between Teaching Thinking. and CSCL [J]. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning,2006, (1).707-716.
  • 6Suthers, D. D. (2006).Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL http://liltics.hawaii. edu/lil#papers/2006/Suthers-ij CSC L-2006.pdf.
  • 7Fahy, P. J. (2005). Two methods for assessing critical thinking in computer-mediated communications (CMC) transcripts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (March). [DB/OL ]http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_05/article02.htm.
  • 8Stahl. G. Group cognition-Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.335,320.
  • 9Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. [DB/OL]http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/publications/journals/manifesto.pdf.
  • 10Hill.C, Cummings, M & Van Aalst. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing participation within a knowledge building community [C]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. April 21-25, 2003.

共引文献1651

同被引文献81

引证文献10

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部