期刊文献+

影响序贯创新的因素分析 被引量:1

Influencing Factors of Progress and Direction of Sequential Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从知识产权法律法规、技艺、市场需求及创新者自身素质等多角度分析影响序贯创新的主要因素。研究结果表明,这些要素是否能够改变下游创造者增量创新或外围创新决策取决于它们是否引起上下游创造者的保留价格对称或不对称的变化。知识产权杠杆作用或许富有吸引力,但也不确定。在此基础上,文章指出政策制定者为了优化创新和创造力而修订知识产权制度之前,应该考虑知识产权法之外的其他干预措施是否会更有效或成本更低。 To explore the influencing factors of sequential innovation. Analysis of the main factors affecting sequential innovation from the perspectives of intellectual property right, regulations, skills, market demand and innovator quality. The results show that, whether these factors can change the incremental innovation of downstream creators or the decision of peripheral innovation depends on whether they lead to asymmetric or asymmetric changes in the retention price of upstream and downstream creators. Intellectual property leverage may be attractive, but it is also uncertain. On that basis, the article points out that before policymakers revise the intellectual property regime to optimize innovation and creativity, they should consider whether interventions other than intellectual property law will be more effective or less costly.
作者 张汝斌 胡允银 刘倩 吴海虹 邓艺 ZHANG Rubin;HU Yunyin;LIU Qian;WU Haihong;DENG Yi(Yunnan Academy of Science and Technology,Kunming 650228;Taizhou university,Taizhou 318000;Kunming Institute of Zoology,CAS,Kunming 650223;Yunnan academy of science & technology information,Kunming 650051)
出处 《中国科技资源导刊》 2019年第4期36-41,95,共7页 China Science & Technology Resources Review
关键词 序贯创新 增量创新 外围创新 知识产权 上游创造者 下游创造者 sequential innovation incremental innovation peripheral innovation intellectual property right upstream creator downstream creator
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献111

  • 1董雪兵,史晋川.累积创新框架下的知识产权保护研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(5):97-105. 被引量:59
  • 2寇宗来,张剑.累积创新中的内生许可证[J].世界经济文汇,2006(6):1-30. 被引量:4
  • 3Grossman, G. and C. Shapiro, "Dynamic R&D Competition", Economic Journal, 1987, 97, 372-387.
  • 4Horowitz, A. and E. Lai, "Patent Length and Rate of Innovation", International Economic Review,1996, 37, 785-601.
  • 5Klemperer, P., "How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection be?" RAND Journal of Economics,1990, 21, 113-130.
  • 6Lanjouw, J. and M. Shankerman, "Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition",RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, 32, 129-151.
  • 7Lee, T. and L. Wilde, "Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980, 94, 429-436.
  • 8Loury, G., "Market Structure and Innovation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979, 93, 395-410.
  • 9Machlup, F. and E. Penrose, "The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century", Journal of Economic History, 1950, 10, 1-29.
  • 10Merges, R. and R. Nelson, "On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope", Columbia law Review,1990, 90, 839-916.

共引文献79

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部