期刊文献+

阿司匹林/富血小板纤维蛋白复合物促进大鼠种植体周围骨缺损修复的实验研究 被引量:7

Effect of Aspirin/Platelet-rich Fibrin Complex on Bone Restoration of Peri-implant Bone Defects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究阿司匹林/富血小板纤维蛋白(platelet-rich fibrin,PRF)复合物修复大鼠种植体周围骨缺损的效果。方法:雄性SD大鼠30只(8周龄),12只用于制备PRF及阿司匹林/PRF复合物(阿司匹林浓度100mg/L);18只用于制备种植体周围骨缺损模型,大鼠双侧胫骨近干骺端分别制备种植窝,在种植窝远中一侧骨壁制备1.5mm×2.0mm的骨缺损,植入种植体后,按骨缺损的处理情况随机分为3组:空白组:骨缺损内不做任何处理;对照组:骨缺损内植入PRF膜;实验组:骨缺损内植入阿司匹林/PRF复合物,每组各6只。植入后4、8周,每组处死3只大鼠并获取标本,制作种植体骨磨片,苦味酸-品红染色(VanGieson,VG)染色,进行大体、组织学观察和骨计量学分析。结果:植入后4周,实验组种植体骨结合率[(57.30±6.76)%]显著高于对照组[(45.93±6.53)%]和空白组[(27.35±10.31)%](P<0.05),且对照组种植体骨结合率显著高于空白组(P<0.05);实验组新骨生成率[(24.34±6.11)%]显著高于对照组[(14.30±4.86)%]和空白组[(10.79±2.14)%](P<0.05),对照组新骨生成率与空白组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。植入后8周,实验组种植体骨结合率[(64.34±6.02)%]显著高于对照组[(52.62±6.08)%]和空白组[(54.32±6.57)%](P<0.05),对照组种植体骨结合率与空白组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组新骨生成率[实验组:(30.16±3.58)%、对照组:(26.27±5.36)%、空白组:(25.33±4.25)%]比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:阿司匹林/PRF复合物可在骨愈合早期促进种植体周围骨缺损区的骨再生,缩短骨愈合时间,促进种植体骨结合。 Objective:To evaluate the effect of Aspirin/platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) complex on repairing peri-implant bone defects in rats.Methods:A total of 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats (8 weeks of age) were used in the present study.12 rats were used to prepare PRF and aspirin/PRF complex (100 mg/L) and 18 rats were used to prepare the peri-implant bone defects on both sides of tibia,and bone defects (1.5 mm×2.0 mm) were created along one distal bone wall of each implant sites.After implants placement,the rats were randomly divided into three groups:the bone defects in control group was left empty;the bone defects in PRF control group was implanted with PRF alone;and bone defects of aspirin/PRF complex group was implanted with aspirin/PRF complex.Three rats from each group were randomly sacrificed at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after implantation surgery.Specimens were subjected to general observation,bone histological observation,and histomorphometric analysis.Results:4 weeks after implantation surgery,the implant bone contact rate in the aspirin/PRF complex group [(57.30±6.76)%] was sig- nificantly higher than that in the PRF control group [(45.93±6.53)%] and the control group [(27.35± 10.31)%]( P <0.05),and the implant bone contact rate in the PRF control group was also significantly higher than that in the control group ( P <0.05).The new bone areas percentage in the aspirin/PRF complex group [(24.34±6.11)%] was significantly higher than that in the PRF control group [(14.30±4.86)%] and the control group [(10.79±2.14)%]( P <0.05).There was no statistical difference between PRF control group and control group ( P >0.05).8 weeks after implantation surgery,the implant bone contact rate in the aspirin/PRF complex group [(64.34±6.02)%] was significantly higher than that in the PRF control group [(52.62±6.08)%] and the control group [(54.32±6.57)%]( P <0.05).There was no statistical difference between PRF control group and control group ( P >0.05).In term of the new bone areas percentage,there was no statistical difference among aspirin/PRF complex group [(30.16±3.58)%],PRF control group [(26.27±5.36)%],and control group [(25.33±4.25)%]( P >0.05).Conclusions:Aspirin/PRF complex promotes bone regeneration in the bone defect area surrounding implant in the early stage of bone healing,shortens the implants and bone healing cycle,and improves the implants osseointegration.
作者 陈瑞 李风兰 CHEN Rui;LI Fenglan(School and Hospital of Stomatology,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030001,China;Department of Prosthodontics,Affiliated People's Hospital,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030012,China)
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第8期761-765,共5页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 山西省重点研发计划(编号:201703D321027-2)
关键词 阿司匹林 富血小板纤维蛋白 种植体 骨再生 Aspirin platelet-rich fibrin implant bone regeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献74

  • 1丁俊清,吕晓春,程祥惠,杨碧玉,雷志敏,周海孝,李俊,段春枝,张远芳,王丽红.珊瑚颗粒即刻植入种植体周骨缺损的实验研究[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2004,25(4):422-425. 被引量:1
  • 2陈发明,吴织芬,金岩.牙周组织工程研究进展[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2004,39(6):520-522. 被引量:19
  • 3方伟,陈建钢,梁惠,张俊,赵怡芳.脱钙冻干骨修复种植周骨缺损的扫描电镜观察[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(5):630-631. 被引量:5
  • 4王奕,马国武,仲维健.自体骨碎末与复合移植修复种植体周围骨缺损的比较研究[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(1):57-59. 被引量:5
  • 5Caudill R, Lancaster D. Histologic analysis of the osseointegration of endosseous implants in simulated extraction sockets with and without e-PTFE barriers. Part Ⅱ: Histomorphometric findings. J Oral Implantol. 1993;19(2):209-215.
  • 6Barzilay I. Immediate implants: their current status. Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6(2):169-175.
  • 7Ettinger RL, Spivey TD, Han DH, et al. Measurement of the interface between bone and immediate endosseous implants: a pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(4): 420-431.
  • 8Ronuld L, James D. Measurement of the interface between bone and immediate endosseous implants: a pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:420-427.
  • 9Schou S, Holmstru P, Jorgensen T, et al. Anorganic porous bovine-derived bone mineral (Bio-Oss) and ePTFE membrane in the treatment of peri-implantitis in cynomolgus monkeys. Clin Oral Implant Res.2003; 14(5):535-547.
  • 10Yoon HC, Choi JY, Jung UW, et al. Effects of different deths of gap on healing of surgically created coronal defects around implants in doqs: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2008;79(2):355-361.

共引文献55

同被引文献44

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部