期刊文献+

MRI测量Ⅱ及Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶大小对微创治疗方式选择的意义 被引量:7

The significance on the selection of minimally invasive treatment with MRI measuring the size of Ⅱ and Ⅲ cesarean scar pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨核磁共振(MRI)影像上Ⅱ及Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)病灶的长度(L)及高度(H)与临床微创治疗方式选择的关系。方法:回顾分析中国医科大学附属盛京医院第一微创妇科2016年1月至2019年2月收治的110例Ⅱ及Ⅲ型CSP患者的临床资料。根据手术方式不同分为宫腔镜组(86例)及宫腹腔镜联合组(24例);根据术前是否行子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)分为非UAE组(61例)及UAE组(49例)。通过测量MRI妊娠病灶的L和H,分别评估L、H、L*H、L/H及血人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)对微创治疗方式选择及UAE治疗的影响,统计分析选择恰当治疗方式的临界指标。结果:宫腔镜组与宫腹腔镜联合组妊娠病灶的L、H、L*H及L/H比较,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05);L≥28.95mm、H≥26.59mm、L*H≥378.76分别是CSP病灶大小行宫腹腔镜联合治疗的临界值,L/H于临界值时有较好的特异度(95.3%),但敏感度低(33.3%)。非UAE组及UAE组妊娠病灶的L及血HCG比较,差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。结论:测量MRI影像CSP病灶大小对于选择恰当微创治疗方式具有较好的指导价值。以妊娠病灶L≥28.95mm、H≥26.59mm或L*H≥378.76作为界定选择宫腹腔镜联合治疗的界定标准,可获得较好的特异度和敏感度。 Objective: To explore the relationship between the clinical minimally invasive surgery and the length(L) and height(H) of type Ⅱ and Ⅲ cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP) lesions on magnetic resonance examination(MRI). Methods: 110 patients diagnosed as type Ⅱ and Ⅲ CSP in Shenjing Hospital affiliated to China Medical University from Jan.2016 to Feb.2019 were included in the study.According to the different surgical methods,patients were divided into the hysteroscopic group and hysteroscopy-laparoscopic group as well as non-uterine artery embolization(UAE) group and UAE group.By measuring L and H of CSP on MRI,evaluating the effects of L,H,L*H,L/H and HCG on the selection of minimally invasive surgery and UAE therapy.Meanwhile analyzed the threshold of appropriate treatment. Results: The difference of L,H,L*H and L/H between the hysteroscopic group and the hysteroscopy-laparoscopic group was statistically significant ( P <0.05).When L≥28.95mm,H≥26.59mm,L*H≥378.76 were the threshold for selecting hysteroscopy-laparoscopic combined surgery.L/H has good specificity (95.3%) at the threshold,but the sensitivity was low(33.3%).The difference of L and HCG in non-UAE and UAE group was statistically significant( P <0.05). Conclusions: MRI measuring CSP lesion size has a good guiding value for selecting appropriate minimally invasive surgery.Choosing CSP lesions L≥28.95mm,H≥26.59mm or L*H≥378.76 as the threshold for hysteroscopy-laparoscopic treatment,both specificity and sensitivity can be obtained.
作者 马贺迪 戴姝艳 Ma Hedi;Dai Shuyan(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004)
出处 《现代妇产科进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第9期672-675,共4页 Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 沈阳市科学技术项目计划(No:F14-158-9-41)
关键词 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠 病灶大小 宫腔镜 腹腔镜 子宫动脉栓塞术 CSP Size of the lesion Hysteroscopy Laparoscopy UAE
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献92

  • 1水旭娟.彩色多普勒超声在诊断子宫瘢痕妊娠中的应用[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2005,14(8):636-637. 被引量:32
  • 2金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 3任彤,赵峻,万希润,刘欣燕,冯凤芝,向阳.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断及处理[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(6):433-436. 被引量:169
  • 4Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First- trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Ob- stet Gynecol, 2003, 21: 220-227.
  • 5Scow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Caesarean sear pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gyne- col, 2004, 23: 247-253.
  • 6Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 23: 415 - 421.
  • 7Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107.. 1373- 1377.
  • 8Shih JC. Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis with three - di- mensional (aD) ultrasound and aD power Doppler. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23:306 - 307.
  • 9Fylstra DLo Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a re- view. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57.. 537-543.
  • 10Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG, 2007, 114.. 253-263.

共引文献1102

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部