摘要
人工智能生成物的客体属性决定了其在现有民事权利体系中能否找到相应位置,进而决定法律规范的制度选择。按照类推解释的基本规则,首先需寻找与人工智能生成物最为接近的民事权利客体类型,其次明确知识产权客体的概念内涵及判定规则,最终确定人工智能生成物的客体属性。知识产权的客体是智力财产,对智力财产的判定应当从其产生过程进行考量,调整的过程论作为甄别智力财产的标准已在实定法和判例中得到确认。从产生过程分析,人工智能生成物在现阶段只是数据算法的结论,其本质是计算与模仿,不是智力劳动,不具有智力财产的属性,无法成为知识产权的客体,应当归属于公有领域,冒名发表等问题可通过法律解释在现有规范体系内加以解决。
The objective attribute of artificial intelligence products determines whether they can find a corresponding position in the existing civil rights system,and then determines the institutional choice of legal norms. According to the basic rules of analogical interpretation,we should firstly find the closest object type of civil rights for artificial intelligence products,then the concept connotation and de- cision rule should be clearly defined,and finally confirm the objective attribution of artificial intelligence product. Through this argumentation,the following conclusion has been formed: the object of intellectu- al property rights is intellectual property,and the judgment of intellectual property should be considered from the process of its production. Currently,the artificial intelligence product is still only the conclu- sion of data algorithm,its essence is computation,not intellectual work and does not conform to the bas- ic definition of intellectual property,and can not be the object of intellectual property right. Problems such as pseudonymous publication can be solved by legal interpretation in existing standard system.
出处
《比较法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期138-150,共13页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年项目“移动互联网环境下的作品法定许可制度研究”(17XJC820001)
中央高校基本科研业务费(2019CDJSK08XK03)的资助
关键词
人工智能
权利客体
智力财产
知识产权
artificial intelligence
the object of right
intellectual property
intellectual property rights