期刊文献+

腹主动脉瘤手术适应证及形态学破裂风险评估的进展 被引量:3

Advances in surgical indications and morphological rupture-risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结腹主动脉瘤(abdominal aortic aneurysm,AAA)的干预阈值的最新循证医学证据以及AAA形态学破裂风险评估方面的新进展及其临床应用价值。方法收集关于特定人群的AAA患者以及特殊形态学特征AAA的破裂风险的国内外文献并进行综述。结果进一步降低干预阈值后,特定亚组的无症状患者同样可能从AAA手术中获益。同时,除了瘤体最大径外,瘤体真实几何形态、瘤壁厚度、附壁血栓等形态学因素对于AAA的破裂风险同样有着重要的预测价值。结论制定基于AAA患者实际情况的个体化破裂风险评估方案,能更准确地服务于临床的诊断和治疗。 Objective This paper aimed to summarize the new progress in surgical indications regarding as maximum diameter from evidence-based medical evidence and morphological rupture-risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and its clinical application value. Method The rupture-risk and its mechanism of AAA in specific population and morphological characteristics were reviewed. Results Asymptomatic patients in specific subgroups may also benefit from AAA repair by lowering the intervention threshold. Besides the maximum diameter of aneurysm, other morphological factors, such as the true geometric shape, the wall thickness, and mural thrombus also had important predictive value for AAA rupture risk. Conclusion Rupture-risk assessment based on the actual individual situation of AAA patients can further facilitate the clinical diagnosis and treatment.
作者 李立强 谷涌泉 LI Liqiang;GU Yongquan(Department of Vascular Surgery,Xuanwu Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053,P. R. China)
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2019年第8期997-1001,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
基金 北京市医院管理局“登峰”人才计划(项目编号:DFL20150801)
关键词 腹主动脉瘤 修复阈值 腹主动脉瘤破裂 破裂风险指数 腹主动脉瘤腔内隔绝术 综述 abdominal aortic aneurysm size threshold for repair ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk index endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair review
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献108

  • 1赵纪春.破裂腹主动脉瘤的诊断和外科治疗[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(6):640-641. 被引量:9
  • 2Lindholt JS. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.. Dan Med Bull, 2010,57(12) :B4219.
  • 3Powell JT, Gotensparre SM, Sweeting MJ, et al. Rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review of the Literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011,41(1):2-10.
  • 4Hoegh A, Lindholt JS. Vascular distensibility as a predictive tool in the management of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneu- rysms. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2009,43(4):333-338.
  • 5Li ZY, Sadat U, U-King-Ira J, et al. Association between aneu- rysm shoulder stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: a longitudinal follow-up study. Circulation, 2010, 122 (18): 1815- 1822.
  • 6Polzer S, Gasser TC, Swedenhorg J, et al. The impact of intralu- minal thromhus failure on the mechanical stress in the wall of ab- dominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011,41 (4) :467-473.
  • 7Meyer CA, Guivier-Curien C, Moore JE Jr. Trans-thrombus blood pressure effects in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng, 2010,132(7) :071005.
  • 8Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Kamarianakts Y, et al. The role of geometric parameters in the prediction of abdominal aortic an- eurysm wall stress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2010, 39(1) :42- 48.
  • 9Gasser TC, Auer M, Labruto F, et al. Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. Eur J Vasc En- dovasc Surg, 2010, 40(2) : 176-185.
  • 10Corbett TJ, Doyle BJ, Callanan A, et al. Engineering silicone rubbers for in vitro studies: creating AAA models and ILT ana- logues with physiological properties. J Biomech Eng, 2010, 132 (1) :011008.

共引文献50

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部