期刊文献+

乾隆《潞安府志》所出“党参”考 被引量:2

Examinations of “Dangshen”in Qianlong Lu’an Fu Records
原文传递
导出
摘要 乾隆《潞安府志》有“党参”一条,从名称上看近似“上党人参”的简称或别名,但“上党人参”是五加科人参,而《潞安府志》所出“党参”却是桔梗科党参,二者并非一物。通过梳理清代本草,可知桔梗科党参的药用历史其实很短,至早在清代康熙年间使用,并且一开始是冒充“上党人参”出现的,而其名“党参”产生则更晚。随着人们使用日久,桔梗科党参成了公认的人参替代品,渐有“党参”之名,但此时各类文献中出现的“上党人参”“上党参”也同“党参”一样皆指桔梗科党参。 Qianlong Lu an Fu Records has an entry called “Dangshen”. It looks to be an abbreviated form or a byname of “Shangdang ginseng”. Yet “Shangdang ginseng” belongs to the Araliaceae family, while the “Dangshen” in Lu an Fu Records belongs to the Campanulaceae family, a different species. Through examinations of Qing Dynasty herbal medicine, we learn that the medicinal history of Dangshen of the Campanulaceae family was fairly short. It was used during the Reign of Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty at the earliest, and appeared at the very beginning as the counterfeit of “Shangdang ginseng”. The name “Dangshen” appeared even more late. As people grew accustomed to its usage, Dangshen of the Campanulaceae family became a generally accepted alternative of ginseng, but the names of “Shangdang ginseng”“Shangdang shen” appeared in all sorts of literature during this period all refer to Dangshen of the Campanulaceae family like “Dangshen”.
作者 白羽 Bai Yu
出处 《中国地方志》 2019年第4期82-92,I0004,I0005,共13页 China Local Records
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献5

共引文献1

同被引文献39

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部