期刊文献+

《极地水域船舶作业国际规则》的法律属性析论 被引量:3

ANALYSIS OF LEGAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE INTERNATIONAL CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《极地水域船舶作业国际规则》(简称《极地规则》)是国际海事组织为极地水域船舶航行安全与防止环境污染制定的技术性国际规则。该规则的体系构成是以MARPOL、SOLAS和STCW三大公约修正案为基础,因此使其对缔约国具有强制约束力,并沿袭了技术性、前瞻性等属性。从普适性角度衡量,该规则因为制定主体、立法结构与实际履约等问题尚不足以构成“一般接受的国际规则和标准”。我国应当吸取其中的先进立法理念,并积极加强国内履约,为即将到来的北极航运高峰做准备。此外,鉴于《极地规则》与《联合国海洋法公约》(简称《公约》)的冰封区域条款之间相对独立,我国在遵守沿海国单边立法的同时应积极倡导在极地地区适用以《极地规则》为核心的统一标准。我国对北极航道的使用呈逐年增加的趋势,这势必要求厘清《极地规则》的法律属性以维护我国的北极航运利益。 The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (referred to as the Polar Code) is a technical international rulebook established by the International Maritime Organization to safeguard shipping in polar waters and prevent environmental pollution.The system of the Polar Code is based on amendments of the MARPOL,SOLAS and STCW conventions and it inherits their technical and forward-looking attributes.However,in terms of universality,the code cannot be regarded as “generally accepted international rules and standards” because of issues concerning the rule maker,legislative structures and actual implementation of the code.China should absorb the advanced legislative concepts and actively strengthen its domestic implementation of the code to meet the requirements of the upcoming peak in Arctic shipping.In addition,given the relative independence between the Polar Code and the “ice-covered areas” clause of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(referred to as the Convention),China should actively advocate application of the Polar Code as the core standard in polar regions,while complying with unilateral legislation of coastal countries.China’s use of the Arctic Passage is increasing annually and therefore the legal attributes of the Polar Code must be clarified to safeguard China’s Arctic shipping interests.
作者 袁雪 童凯 Yuan Xue;Tong Kai(School of Humanities and Social Science,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China)
出处 《极地研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期334-345,共12页 Chinese Journal of Polar Research
基金 自然资源部海洋发展战略研究所项目 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(HEUCFP201831) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(3072019CFP1301)资助 黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(16FXB01)
关键词 极地规则 联合国海洋法公约 冰封区域条款 一般接受的国际规则和标准 目标型标准 Polar Code United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea “ice-covered areas”clause generally accepted international rules and standards Goal-Based Standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献56

  • 1李桢,裘建伟.IMO成员国自愿审核机制的现状、趋势和挑战[J].世界海运,2007,30(1):40-42. 被引量:7
  • 2[法]亚历山大·基斯著,张若思译.国际环境法[M].北京:法律出版社,2002.
  • 3Chung, Suh-Yong, Is the Mediterranean Regional Cooperation Model Applicable to Northeast Asia?[J].Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 1999, (Winter): 365.
  • 4PAME Working Group Meeting(5-8 June2000)Copenhagen 3.
  • 5Mr. Tomas H. Heidar Legal Adviser, Oceans and the Law of the Sea Statement[EB/OL], http://www, mfa. is/speeches-and-arcticles/nr/3817# pageextra2, visit on: 2008-12-4.
  • 6[EB/OL]http://www. mil. news. sohu. com/20090423/n263585347, shtml ,visit on:2009/5/11.
  • 7Rob Huebert. Article 234 and Marine pollution Jurisdiction in the Arctic[A]. in Alex G . Oude Elferlnk and Donald R. Rothwell (eds.), The Law of the Sea and Polar Maritime Delimitation and Jurisdiction[C]. 2001:249.
  • 8E. Franckx. Maritime claims in the Arctic: Canadian and Russian perspeetive[A] . note 31 at 96, in Donald R. Rothwell (eds.) ,Polar Record [J]. vol. 30,January 1994:62-63.
  • 9周子亚 祝嘉汉 章克俭.关于海洋污染管辖权的问题.上海社会科学院学术季刊,1986,(2):11-17.
  • 10R. St. J. MacDonald. The New Canadian Declaration of Acceptance of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice[J]. (1970) 8 CYIL: 3-38.

共引文献65

同被引文献37

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部