期刊文献+

不确定的沟通:新媒体语境下新闻报道中的科学争议研究

Uncertain Communication: Controversy of Science in New Media Coverage
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2016年10月-2017年2月黑龙江禁种转基因粮食作物事件为例深入分析转基因的知识争议问题。选取《黑龙江日报》、《科技日报》、澎湃新闻三家代表性媒体相关议题的报道,分析探讨不同媒体是如何报道这次转基因争议事件的,其间,作为知识权威的专家是如何参与到转基因知识争议事件中去的。同时考察公众对此次转基因事件的态度,分析他们是如何参与讨论的。 Scientific knowledge is by nature uncertain, which often arouses controversy in the process of implementing science and technology policies. This article takes the event of banning genetically modified food crops in Heilongjiang Province from October 2016 to February 2017 as an example to analyze the knowledge controversy of genetically modified crops. It selects three representatives of media outlets, i.e. Heilongjiang Daily, Science and Technology Daily and thePaper.cn, to discuss how different media reported the genetically modified food controversy incident and how experts were involved in the controversy. It also examines the public attitude towards the incident and public participation in the discussion.
作者 褚金勇 王俊儒 Chu Jinyong;Wangjunru
出处 《传媒观察》 2019年第8期41-49,共9页 Media Observer
基金 2015年度国家哲学社科基金青年项目“争议性新闻事件中的专家参与研究”(项目编号:15CXW006) 2017年度河南省优势特色学科平台重点项目“报刊书写与中国文人的价值认同研究”(项目编号:2017-XWXY-005) 2019年度河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目“新媒体影响下知识人的书写观念转型研究”(项目编号:2019-ZZJH-541)之阶段性成果
关键词 转基因 知识争议 新闻报道 genetically modified knowledge controversy news report
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1[9]MOE R C.The 'Reinventing Government' Exercise:Misinteristration Review,1994,54(2):111-122.
  • 2[10]FREDERICKSON H G.Comparing th e Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration[J].Public Administration Review,1996,56(3):263-270.
  • 3[11]HART D K,HART D W.Why the Gore Report Will Probably Fail[J].International Journal of Public Administration,1997,20(1):183-220.
  • 4[12]HAQUE S M.The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Governance[J].Public Administrative Review,2001,61(1):65-82.
  • 5[13]DENHARDT R B,DENHARDT J V.The New Public Service:Serving,not Steering[M].Armonk:M.E.Sharpe,2003.
  • 6[14]吴定.公共政策辞典[M].台北:五南图书公司,1998.
  • 7[15]BENHABIB S.Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy[C]//BENHABIB S.Democracy and Difference:Contesting the Boundaries of the Political.Princeton:Princeton University Press,1996:67-94.
  • 8[16]MANIN B.On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation[J].Political Theory,1987,15:338-68.
  • 9[17]SUNSTEIN C R.The Law of Group Polarization[C]//FISHKIN J,LASLETT P.Debating Deliberative Democracy.Malden:Blackwell,2003:80-101.
  • 10[18]BOHMAN J,REHG W.Deliberative Democracy:Essays on Reason and Politics[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,1997.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部