老年综合评估及干预在改善老年骨质疏松合并老年综合征患者生活质量中的作用

The Role of Comprehensive Assessment and Intervention in the Elderly in Improving the Quality of Life of Elderly Patients with Osteoporosis Complicated with Senile Syndrome

目的评价老年综合评估及干预在改善老年骨质疏松合并老年综合征患者生活质量中的的效果。方法选择2017年3月—2018年3月前来该院进行治疗的老年骨质疏松合并老年综合征患者124作为研究对象,随机将其分成实验组与对照组,每组62例,对照组不进行特殊干预,实验组采用老年综合评估的干预方式,分析MMSE、IAD-L、HAMD、MNA、DMQLS。结果实验组MMSE(27.5±1.1)分,DMQLS(8.6±1.1)分,对照组MMSE(22.4±2.2)分,DMQLS(23.1±2.2)分(t=16.3263,P=0.0000;t=46.4179,P=0.0000)。实验组的各种分数与对照组相较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组的焦虑分数优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在老年骨质疏松症中,老年综合评估方式的应用有着较高优势与价值,应予以足够的重视,利用合理方式提升整体工作效果。

Objective To evaluate the effect of comprehensive assessment and intervention in the elderly on improving the quality of life of elderly patients with osteoporosis and senile syndrome. Methods A total of 124 patients with senile osteoporosis and senile syndrome who were treated in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2018 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 62 patients in each group. Without special intervention, the experimental group used the intervention method of comprehensive evaluation of the elderly to analyze MMSE, IAD-L,HAMD,MNA,DMQLS. Results The experimental group had MMSE (27.5±1.1)points, DMQLS(8.6±1.1)points, and control MMSE (22.4 ± 2.2) points, DMQLS(23.1±2.2) points(t=16.326 3, P=0.000 0, t=46.417 9, P=0.000 0). There were no differences in the scores of the experimental group compared with the control group(P>0.05). The anxiety score of the experimental group was better than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion In the elderly osteoporosis, the application of the comprehensive evaluation method for the elderly has higher advantages and values, and should be given enough attention to improve the overall work effect by reasonable means.