生态环境损害赔偿诉讼主体的法理定位——以人际同构为分析工具

Jurisprudential thinking of ecological environmental damage compensation litigation——Based on interpersonal isostructuralism

当前在理论上存在着对生态环境损害赔偿诉讼主体的争论,以自然资源资产所有权人代表的所有者为诉讼主体与行政机关作为管理者的诉讼主体是否适格。考虑生态环境损害赔偿诉讼既不是公益诉讼也不是普通民事诉讼,不能从"人域"视角出发对生态环境损害赔偿诉讼主体进行研究,应当从人际同构的角度重新定位生态环境损害赔偿诉讼主体,确认非人物种种群也能作为诉讼主体并且其权力的实现主要通过具有行为能力的主体通过代理制度得以实现。由此,现行生态环境损害赔偿诉讼规定的诉讼主体便有了法理上的指导与解释,解决了管理者与所有者均可以提起诉讼的理论与实践矛盾。

At present,there is a debate upon the subject of ecological environment damage compensation litigation,and there is a contradiction between the owner represented by the owner of natural resource assets and the administrative body as the manager.Considering that ecological environmental damage compensation litigation is neither public interest litigation nor ordinary civil litigation,we should not study the subject of the ecological environmental damage compensation litigation from the perspective of the human domain,but reposition the subject of the ecological environmental damage compensation litigation from the perspective of interpersonal isostructuralism.Confirming the nonhuman species can also serve as the litigation subject and its power mainly through the body of the behavior ability through the agent system.Thus,the subject of the ecological environmental damage compensation litigation has legal guidance,which solves the contradiction between theory and practice that both managers and owners can bring lawsuits.