期刊文献+

基于证据理论的直觉模糊群决策方法 被引量:6

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision-making Method Based on Evidence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对属性权重和专家权重完全未知的直觉模糊群决策问题,提出一种基于证据理论的决策方法。基于记分函数和属性不确定度,将专家的直觉模糊决策矩阵转化为Mass函数;运用了基于直觉模糊熵的属性权重计算方法,将专家针对属性集关于方案集的评价证据进行修正与合成;确定了考虑接近度与相似度的专家权重计算方法,融合了TOPSIS法与Jousselme距离度量专家权重,将各专家关于方案集的评价证据进行修正与合成,最后进行方案排序。运用实例证明了方法的合理性和有效性。 In order to solve the intuitionistic fuzzy group decision problem with completely unknown attribute weight and expert weight,a decision method based on evidence theory is proposed.Based on the scoring function and attribute uncertainty,the expert’s intuitionistic fuzzy decision matrix is transformed into Mass function. The method of attribute weight calculation considering intuitionistic fuzzy entropy is determined. The evaluation evidence of attribute set about schema set is modified and synthesized by experts. The expert weight calculation method considering proximity and similarity is determined. The TOPSIS method and Jousselme distance are fused to measure the expert weight. The expert evaluation evidence on the schema set is revised and synthesized. Finally,the scheme sequencing is obtained. The rationality and validity of the method are proved by an example.
作者 常政 项华春 陈云翔 罗承昆 CHANG Zheng;XIANG Hua-chun;CHEN Yun-xiang;LUO Cheng-kun(College of Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering,Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710051,China)
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第8期125-130,共6页 Fire Control & Command Control
关键词 证据理论 直觉模糊熵 多属性群决策 效能评估 信息集结 evidence theory intuitionistic fuzzy entropy multi-attribute group decision-making effectiveness evaluation information gathering
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献104

  • 1徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:65
  • 2吴坚,梁昌勇,李文年.基于主观与客观集成的属性权重求解方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(3):383-387. 被引量:54
  • 3戴跃强,徐泽水,达庆利.基于不同直觉偏好结构的多属性决策方法[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,37(4):706-710. 被引量:13
  • 4王小艺,刘载文,侯朝桢,张翠,原菊梅.基于模糊多属性决策的目标威胁估计方法[J].控制与决策,2007,22(8):859-863. 被引量:43
  • 5徐泽水.不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2005.
  • 6DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(4): 325-339.
  • 7LEFEVRE E, COLOT O, VANNOORENBERGHE P, et al. A generic framework of resolving the conflict in the combination of belief structures[C]//In: Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Information Fusion. Paris: ISIF, 2000.
  • 8HAENNI R. Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternatives: comments on "about the belief function combination and the conflict management problem"[J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3(4): 237-239.
  • 9MURPHY C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29(1): 1-9.
  • 10JOUSSELME A L, DOMINIC G. BOSSE E. A new distance between two bodies of evidenee[J]. Information Fusion, 2001, 2(2): 91-101.

共引文献227

同被引文献99

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部