中国八大综合经济区绿色发展绩效及其影响因素研究

Study on Green Development Performance and Influencing Factors in Eight Comprehensive Economic Areas of China

八大综合经济区绿色发展技术效率、绿色TFP增长及其空间差异、绿色发展绩效影响因素。研究方法:运用 US SBM Malmquist模型、Dagum基尼系数、FGLS与PCSE。研究发现:八大综合经济区绿色发展绩效水平整体偏低且呈现鲜明非均衡态势,绿色发展区域总体协同性比较弱;超变密度贡献是总体区域差异产生的主要来源;缩小区域间差异是破解绿色发展区域不均衡问题的关键;各项社会经济因素对八大综合经济区绿色发展绩效的差异性影响在很大程度上弱化了区域发展的协同性。研究创新:以八大综合经济区绿色发展绩效作为研究视角,综合运用 US SBM Malmquist模型、Dagum基尼系数以及面板数据模型,全面揭示八大综合经济区绿色发展绩效现状及其区域差异性。研究价值:传统经济发展绩效的测评忽略了资源与环境对经济发展的刚性约束以及经济新常态下“绿色GDP”与“绿色生产率”的新诉求;为缩小综合经济区绿色发展区域差距及加快推进我国区域绿色可持续协同发展提供重要的经验证据参考。

This paper is to discover the technical efficiency of green development, growth of green TFP and its spatial differences, and influencing factors of green development performance in eight comprehensive economic areasResearch Methods:Using US-SBM-Malmquist model, the methods of Dagum gini coefficient, FGLS and PCSEResearch Findings:Firstly, the performance level of green development in eight comprehensive economic areas is generally low and shows a distinct unbalanced situation, and the regional overall synergies of green development is relatively weakSecondly, the contribution of hypervariable density is the main source of regional overall differenceThirdly, narrowing inter-regional differences is the key to solving the regional imbalance of green developmentLastly, the disparate influences of various social and economic factors on the green development performance of the eight comprehensive economic areas weaken the regional development synergy to a large extentResearch Innovations:This paper studies the green development performance of the eight comprehensive economic areas for the first time, using US-SBM-Malmquist model, Dagum gini coefficient and panel data model, scientifically and comprehensively revealing the current situation and regional differences of green development performance of the eight comprehensive economic areasResearch Value:Traditional economic development performance evaluation ignores the rigid constraints of resources and environment on economic development and the new demands of “green GDP” and “green productivity” under the new normal of economy;providing important empirical evidence references for narrowing the regional disparity of green development in the comprehensive economic areas and accelerating the regional green and sustainable coordinated development in China.