期刊文献+

中国新文学史写作的观念悖论与实践反思 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 中国文学史写作起源于20世纪初年,发展于三四十年代,学科化在新中国成立之后。就现当代文学史而言,反帝反封建、欧风美雨等外在因素如同彗星长长的尾巴,拖拽着文学史家的敏感神经,给他们带来了无尽的困扰,主体与客体、集体与个体、求真与互文、历史与审美之间悖论不断。面对不断前行的文学史写作,我们似乎从来没有满意过,“新民主主义”话语主导下的文学史太过政治化,“启蒙主义”话语主导下的文学史又过于审美化。我们不需要单一、他者化的文学史,也不需要封闭、过度阐释的文学史,我们需要多元、动态、不断反思的文学史。
作者 刘忠
出处 《福建论坛(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第7期82-90,共9页 Fujian Tribune
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“重写文学史与上海批评家群体”(11BZW101)成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Jacques Barzun, "The Critic, the Public, the Past,'Salmagundi, 68-69 (Fall, 1985-Winter, 1986), p. 206.
  • 2Paul Veyne, Writing History : Essay on Epistemology, trans. Mina Moore-Rinvolucri (Middletown, 1984), p.12.
  • 3Benedetto Croce, Primi Saggi, 3rd ed. ( Bari,1951), p.38.
  • 4Cfr. Christopher Norris, "Narrative Theory or Theory-as-Narrative: the Politics of 'Post-Modern' Reason, " in"The Contest of Faculties : Philosophy and Theory after Deconstruction (London and New York, 1985),Ch. 1.
  • 5Hayden White, "The Problem of Style in Realistic Representation: Marx and Flaubert," in The Concept of Style, ed. Betel Lang (Philadelphia, 1979), pp. 213-229.
  • 6See Stephen Bann, The Clothing of Clio: A Study of the Representation of History in Nineteen-Century Britain and France (Cambridge, 1984), and Linch Orr's superb review ofit in History and Theory , XXIV, 3(1985), pp. 307-325.
  • 7F.R. Ankersmit, "The Dilemma of Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Philosophy of History, "an introduction to History and Theory, Beiheft 25 (1986).
  • 8Hayden White, "Rhetoric and History," in Hayden White and Frank E. Manuel, Theories of History: Clark Memorial Library Papers (Los Angeles, 1978).
  • 9F.R. Ankersmit, "The Dilemma of Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Philosophy of History," MS.
  • 10E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (London and New York, 1960).

共引文献15

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部