期刊文献+

根治性前列腺切除术对淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者预后影响的系统评价和Meta分析 被引量:8

The benefit of radical prostatectomy in patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价根治性前列腺切除术(RP)对淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者预后的影响。方法检索从建库至2018年11月关于淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者行RP和未行RP对比分析的相关文献,检索数据库包括Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普中文科技期刊数据库和万方中文数据库。对纳入的文献使用统计软件RevMan 5.3进行Meta分析。主要结局指标为总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)。结果共纳入6篇回顾性研究,包含7 890例患者,其中6 247例行RP治疗,1 643例未行RP治疗。与未行RP者相比,行RP者在OS (HR=0.55,95%CI 0.49~0.62,P<0.001)和CSS (HR=0.49,95%CI 0.42~0.57,P<0.001)方面有显著改善。结论RP可能改善淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者的OS和CSS,但是需要更多的随机对照试验来验证。 Objective To evaluate the benefit of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer. Methods A systematic review of the studies about radical prostatectomy for the prognosis of node-positive prostate cancer was performed. An electronic search was completed on the basis of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China Biology Medicine disc(CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP and Wanfang database from inception up to November 2018. The outcomes are overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival(CSS). Results Six studies incorporating 7 890 patients were eligible for the present meta-analysis. 6 247 patients underwent RP, the remaining 1 643 patients did not undergo RP. Lymph node-positive patients treated with RP had improved OS (HR=0.55, 95%CI 0.49-0.62, P<0.001) and CSS (HR=0.49, 95%CI 0.42-0.57, P<0.001). Conclusions Radical prostatectomy may be a beneficial option for patients with lymph node metastases at initial diagnosis, which also improve the OS and CSS. More randomized controlled trials are needed to give more evidence further.
作者 胡旭 杨为潇 窦卫超 邵彦翔 熊三钞 刘健帮 李响 Hu Xu;Yang Weixiao;Dou Weichao;Shao Yanxiang;Xiong Sanchao;Liu Jianbang;Li Xiang(Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第8期625-629,共5页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 淋巴结阳性 根治性前列腺切除术 荟萃分析 Prostatic neoplasms Lymph node-positive Radical prostatectomy Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1高新,邱剑光,蔡育彬,周祥福,温星桥.控尿技术在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):176-179. 被引量:29
  • 2赫捷,陈万青.2012中国肿瘤登记年报[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2012:12-25.
  • 3那彦群,孙颖浩,徐勇,等.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南[M]//那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南:2014版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:61-89.
  • 4Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012[ J]. Int J Cancer, 2015, 136:E359-386.
  • 5Siegel R, Ma JM, Zou ZH, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64:9-29.
  • 6Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates[ J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61 : 1079-1092.
  • 7Sato Y, Fukuhara H, Suzuki M, et al. Long-term results of radical prostatectomy with immediate adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for pT3N0 prostate cancer [J]. BMC Urol, 2014, 14:13-18.
  • 8Wright JL, Dalkin BL, Yrue LD, et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality [J]. JUrol, 2010, 183:2213-2218.
  • 9Stephenson A J, Eggener SE, Hernandez AV, et al. Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65:675-680.
  • 10Bach C, Pisipati S, Daneshwar D, et al. The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer [ J ]. Nat Rev Urol, 2014, 11: 342-351.

共引文献159

同被引文献72

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部