期刊文献+

印度成为RCEP谈判之“钉”的原因分析及近期立场变化 被引量:11

The Reasons for India to Be an Obstacle of the RCEP Negotiation and Its Recent Change of Positions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自RCEP进程开启以来,印度的态度一直犹疑不定,现已成为阻碍谈判的RCEP之“钉”。文章首先从应对世界贸易体系变革,缓解美国贸易战火压力,谋求经济利益或避免经济损失三个方面,揭示了印度参加、滞留于RCEP谈判的根本原因。再从产业发展入手,探讨印度谈判立场的形成与演进,发现保护稚嫩的制造业发展、推进优势服务出口构成了印度强硬谈判立场的核心要素。最后,文章探讨了近期印度谈判立场的变化,发现印度在保持强硬姿态的同时,也为未来谈判预留下交易的空间;同时也指出印度为谋求更有利的协议条款,逐渐走上“以拖待变”之路。各方要想推进谈判、达成协议,将不得不强化对印度施压或增加利益诱惑,引导它做出实质性让步。 Since the start of the RCEP process, India s ambivalence has been a stumbling block to the negotiations. First, the article reveals the fundamental reasons for India s participation and delay in RCEP negotiations from three aspects: dealing with the reform of the world trade system, easing the pressure of a trade war with the United States , seeking economic benefits or avoiding economic losses. Next, this paper discusses the formation and evolution of India s position in the negotiations from the perspective of Indian industrial development, and finds that protecting the immature manufacturing industry and promoting the export of services are central elements of India s tough negotiating stance. Finally, the paper discusses the recent changes in India s negotiating position, and finds that while India maintains a tough stance, it also reserves room for future negotiations. It also points out that India was on a path to " delay for change" in pursuit of better terms. To move forward with the deal, the parties will have to push India to make substantial concessions, either through increased pressure or increased incentives.
作者 曹广伟 陈思凡 Cao Guangwei
出处 《印度洋经济体研究》 CSSCI 2019年第4期110-133,159,160,共26页 Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目:TPP、TTIP对国际经济秩序演变的影响及“一带一路”战略的应对研究(项目编号:16BGJ012)的阶段性成果
关键词 印度 RCEP谈判 世界贸易体系 中印贸易 India The RCEP Negotiations The World Trade System India - China Bilateral Trade
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献30

  • 1陈淑梅,江倩雯.中国—欧盟自由贸易区的产业效应研究——基于GTAP模型的模拟分析[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,16(6):21-25. 被引量:7
  • 2WTO区域贸易协定数据库:http://www.wto.org/english/tratop-e/region-e/region-e.htm.
  • 3Fukunaga, Y. and Isono, I. "Taking ASEAN+ 1 FTAs to- wards the RCEP.. A Mapping Study. " ERIA Discussion Paper Series, 2013, No. DP--2013--02.
  • 4Petri, P. A. , Plummer, M.G. , and Zhai, F. "The Trans- Pacific Partnership and Asia--Pacific Integration: A Quantitative As sessment. " East--West Centre Working Papers Economic Series, No 119, October 24, 2011.
  • 5Petri, P. A. and Plummer, M.G.. "The Trans-- Pacific Partnership and Asia-- Pacific Integration : Policy Impli- cations. " Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, No PB12--16, June 2012.
  • 6Itakura, K. "Impact of Liberalization and Improved Connectiv- ity and Facilitation in ASEAN for the ASEAN Economic Community. " ERIA Discussion Paper, 2013, No. DP--2013--01.
  • 7Lee, H. and Itakura, K. "FTA Sequencing and the Extent of Structural Adjustments: Trans--Pacific Track, Asian Track and EU-- Asia--Pacific Integration. " 2013, Preliminary version.
  • 8Heagney, K. J. "The RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Eco- nomic Partnership) And The Possible Impact of the RCEP on Lao PDR. " ASEAN Economic Cooperation Division, Foreign Trade Policy Department, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, Lao PDR, February 2013.
  • 9Cheong, I. and Tongzon, J. "Comparing the Economic Impact of the Trans -- Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. " Asian Economic Papers, 2013, 12 (2), pp. 144--164.
  • 10黄凌云,刘清华.建立东亚自由贸易区的中国经济效应研究——基于GTAP模型的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2008(12):60-68. 被引量:27

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部