期刊文献+

脊柱术后感染的病原学分析及红细胞免疫水平检测 被引量:1

The etiological characteristics and detection of levels of erythrocyte immune function in patients with an infection after spinal surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析脊柱术后感染的病原学特征,并检测患者红细胞免疫水平变化,探讨其临床意义。 方法收集2015年12月-2017年12月本院收治的脊柱术后发生感染的患者40例为感染组,脊柱术后未感染者40例为未感染组,同一时期在本院体检的健康志愿者40例为对照组。利用全自动微生物鉴定系统分析感染组患者感染病原菌的分布特征;采用郭峰法对3组患者进行红细胞免疫水平检测。 结果感染组40例脊柱术后感染患者共分离出病原菌51株,其中革兰阴性菌28株(54.90%),以铜绿假单胞菌(12株)和大肠埃希菌(10株)为主;革兰阳性菌21株,占41.18%,以金黄色葡萄球菌(11株)和屎肠球菌(5株)为主;真菌2株,占3.92%。检测FEER、ATER、DTER、RBC-C3bR,感染组分别为(45.54±4.89)%、(51.36±5.27)%、(25.39±2.72)%、(12.76±1.46)%,未感染组分别为(53.56±5.44)%、(63.12±6.81)%、(32.08±3.90)%、(16.02±2.02)%,与对照组(62.15±6.31)%、(69.29±7.05)%、(39.67±4.85)%、(19.95±2.36)%比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);感染组与未感染组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论脊柱术后感染病原菌分布广泛,主要为革兰阴性菌,以铜绿假单胞菌为主。脊柱术后感染患者红细胞免疫水平明显下降,治疗时应重视观察上述指标的变化。 Objectives To analyze the etiological characteristics of patients with an infection after spinal surgery and to detect changes in levels of erythrocyte immune function and explore their clinical significance. Methods Forty patients who developed an infection after spinal surgery at this Hospital from December 2015to December 2017served as patients with an infection,and 40patients without an infection after spinal surgery served as patients without an infection.Forty healthy volunteers seen at this Hospital during the same period served as the control group.Characteristics of pathogen distribution in patients with an infection were analyzed using an automated microbiological identification system;the levels of erythrocyte immune function in the three groups were measured using the method of Guo et al. Results A total of 51 strains of pathogens were isolated from 40patients with an infection following spinal surgery,including 28strains of Gram-negative bacteria(54.90%)that were mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12strains)and Escherichia coli (10 strains),21strains of Gram-positive bacteria(41.18%)that were mainly Staphylococcus aureus(11strains)and Enterococcus faecium (5strains),and 2strains of fungi.(3.92%).FEER,ATER,DTER,and RBC-C3bR were determined and were 45.54±4.89%,51.36±5.27%,25.39±2.72%,and 12.76±1.46%in patients with an infection and 53.56 ±5.44%,63.12±6.81%,32.08±3.90%,and 16.02±2.02%in patients without an infection.FEER,ATER,DTER, and RBC-C3bR were 62.15±6.31%,69.29±7.05%,39.67±4.85%,and 19.95±2.36%in the control group. FEER,ATER,DTER,and RBC-C3bR in patients with an infection and patients without an infection differed significantly from FEER,ATER,DTER,and RBC-C3bR in the control group(P<0.05).FEER,ATER,DTER,and RBC-C3bR differed significantly in patients with an infection and patients without an infection(P<0.05). Conclusion A wide range of pathogens caused an infection after spinal surgery;those pathogens were mainly Gram-negative bacteria,the most prevalent of which was Pseudomonas aeruginosa.The levels of erythrocyte immune function decreased significantly in patients with an infection after spinal surgery,and changes in the aforementioned indices should be observed during treatment.
作者 鄢家强 周鑫 董革辉 韩建华 王瑞春 任强 YAN Jia-qiang;ZHOU Xin;DONG Ge-hui;HAN Jian-hua;WANG Rui-chun;REN Qiang(Orthopedic Surgery (Ward2),The First People's Hospital of Zunyi,Zunyi,Guizhou,China 563000)
出处 《中国病原生物学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期830-832,共3页 Journal of Pathogen Biology
关键词 脊柱术后感染 病原菌 红细胞免疫 An infection after spinal surgery pathogens erythrocyte immune function
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献72

  • 1黄俊,谢威,王鹏飞,吕建军.MRI对腰椎间隙感染的早期诊断和治疗价值[J].临床骨科杂志,2005,8(3):221-222. 被引量:18
  • 2黄秉廉.术后患者做C-反应蛋白检测必要性的探讨[J].中国热带医学,2006,6(5):839-839. 被引量:2
  • 3Sampedro,M F,Huddleston P M,Piper K E,et al.A biofilm approach to detect bacteria on removed spinal implants[J].Spine,2010,35(12):1218-1224.
  • 4Silber J S,Anderson G,Yaccaro A R,et al.Management of postprocedural diskitis[J].Spine J,2002,2(6):279-287.
  • 5Brown E M,Pople I K,de Louvois J,Spine update:prevention of postoperative infection in patients undergoing spinal surgery[J].Spine,2004,29(7):938-945.
  • 6Kim J I,Suh K T,Kim S J,et al.Implant removal for the management of infection after instrumented spinal fusion[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2010,23(4):258-265.
  • 7Lee J H,Lee J H,Kim J B,et al.Normal range of the inflammation related laboratory findings and predictors of the postoperative infections in spinal posterior fusion surgery[J].Clin Orthop Surg,2012,4(4):269-277.
  • 8Mirovsky Y,Floman Y,et al.Management of deep wound infection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(2):127-131.
  • 9Rinella A,Bridwell K,Kim Y,et al.Late complications of adult idiopathic scoliosis primary fusions to L4 and above:the effect of age and distal fusion level[J].Spine,2004,29(3):318-325.
  • 10Fang A,Hu S S,Endres N,et al.Risk factors for infection after spinal sugery[J].Spine,2005,30(12):1460- 1465.

共引文献71

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部