期刊文献+

利奈唑胺对重症结核病患者炎性因子、T淋巴细胞水平的影响 被引量:4

Effect of linezolid on inflammatory factors and T lymphocyte levels in patients with severe tuberculosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察利奈唑胺对重症结核病患者炎性因子、T淋巴细胞水平的影响.方法选择浙江金华广福医院2016年4月至2017年11月治疗的重症结核病患者60例为研究对象,根据治疗方案不同分为对照组(n=30)和观察组(n=30).对照组采用个性化抗结核方案治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合利奈唑胺治疗,两组均连续治疗9个月.观察两组治疗前后白细胞介素1(IL-1)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、IL-6、IL-10及CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+变化,比较两组肝功能受损、血小板减少、骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、腹泻发生情况.结果治疗前,两组IL-1、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-10及CD4+、CD8+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).治疗后9个月,对照组IL-1、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-10分别为(10.94±1.31) ng/L、(3.03±0.49) ng/L、(183.43±13.24)ng/L、(134.93±34.51) ng/L,观察组分别为(6.89±1.29) ng/L、(2.49±0.45) ng/L、(129.48±10.74) ng/L、(189.35±43.27) ng/L,两组差异均有统计学意义(t=12.195、11.214、8.414、11.291,均P<0.05);对照组CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+分别为(47.61±7.16)%、(15.49±6.64)%、(20.58±5.61)%、(0.79±0.19),观察组分别为(65.46±8.31)%、(30.23±7.85)%、(34.59±7.41)%、(0.87±0.24),两组差异均有统计学意义(t=10.497、7.865、12.128、10.291,均P<0.05).两组肝功能受损、血小板减少、骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、腹泻发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论利奈唑胺用于治疗重症结核病,有助于降低炎性因子水平,改善患者细胞免疫水平,不良反应发生率较低. Objective To observe the effects of linezolid on the levels of inflammatory factors and T lymphocytes in patients with severe tuberculosis. Methods Sixty patients with severe tuberculosis treated in Jinhua Guangfu Hospital from April 2016 to November 2017 were selected and divided into control group ( n= 30 ) and observation group (n = 30) according to different treatment options. The control group was treated with personalized anti-tuberculosis regimen. The observation group was treated with linezolid on the basis of the control group, and both two groups were treated for 9 months. The changes of interleukin - 1 (IL - 1 ), tumor necrosis factor alpha ( TNF-α), IL - 6, IL-10 and CD3+, CD4+,CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ were observed before and after treatment. The incidence of liver injury, thrombocytopenia, myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea were observed. Results Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in IL -1 ,TNF -α, IL - 6, IL - 10, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ between the two groups(all P > 0. 05). At 9 months after treatment, the levels of IL - 1, TNF -α, IL - 6 and IL - 10 in the control group were (10. 94 ± 1.31) ng/L,(3. 03 ± 0. 49) ng/L,( 183. 43 ± 13. 24) ng/L,( 134. 93 ± 34. 51) ng/L, respectively, which in the observation group were (6. 89 ± 1.29) ng/L,(2. 49 ± 0. 45 ) ng/L,( 129. 48 ± 10. 74) ng/L,(189. 35 ± 43. 27 ) ng/L,respectively, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(t= 12. 195 , 11.214,8.414,11. 291, all P < 0. 05 ). The CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ in the control group were (47. 61 ± 7. 16)%,( 15. 49 ±6. 64)%,(20. 58 ±5. 61 )%,(0. 79 ±0. 19),respectively,which in the observation group were (65.46 ± 8.31)%,( 30. 23 ± 7. 85 )%,( 34. 59 ± 7. 41)%,( 0. 87 ± 0. 24), respectively, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(i = 10.497 ,7. 865,12. 128,10. 291 ,all P <0. 05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of liver function impairment, thrombocytopenia, myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea between the two groups( all P>0. 05). Conclusion Linezolid in the treatment of severe tuberculosis can reduce the level of inflammatory factors, improve the cellular immune level of patients, and has a lower incidence of adverse effects.
作者 曹杨荣 Cao Yangrong(Department of Tuberculosis, Jinhua Guangfu Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321000, China)
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2019年第17期2097-2100,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2012KYA180).
关键词 结核 抗结核药 免疫 细胞 肝功能试验 炎症介导素类 白细胞介素类 肿瘤坏死因子A 利奈陞胺 Tuberculosis Antitubercular agents Immunity cellular Liver function tests Inflam mation mediators Interleukins Tumor necrosis factor-alpha Linezolid
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献119

  • 1黄妮妮,刘洁.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染流行病学调查[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2005,15(1):47-48. 被引量:53
  • 2Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al. Clinical practiceguideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2011, 52(4) :e56-93.
  • 3Fu J, Ye X, Chen C, et al. The efficacy and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides in the treatment of Staphylococcus anreus infections[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(3):e58240.
  • 4Wunderink RG, Niederman MS, Kollef MH, et al. Linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study [ J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2012, 54 (5) :621-629.
  • 5Itani KM, Dryden MS, Bhattacharyya H, et al. Efficacy and safety of linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections proven to be caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus[ J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 199(6) :804-816.
  • 6Wilcox MH, Tack K J, Bouza E, et al. Complicated skin and skin- structure infections and catheter-related bloodstream infections: noninferiority of linezolid in a phase 3 study [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 2009, 48(2) :203-212.
  • 7Wunderink RG, Mendelson MH, Somero MS, et al. Early microbiological response to linezolid vs vancomycin in ventilator- associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [ J ]. Chest, 2008, 134 (6) : 1200-1207.
  • 8Lin DF, Zhang YY, Wu JF, et al. Linezolid for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens in China [ J ]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2008, 32 (3) :241-249.
  • 9Kohno S, Yamaguchi K I Aikawa N, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan [ J ]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2007, 60(6):1361-1369.
  • 10Weigelt J, Itani K, Stevens D, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005, 49 (6) :2260-2266.

共引文献153

同被引文献43

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部