期刊文献+

宫腔镜联合Ki67、Cyr61检测在子宫内膜癌诊断中的价值 被引量:5

Value of hysteroscopy combined with Ki67 and Cyr61 detection in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫腔镜联合细胞核增殖抗原Ki67 (Ki67)、高半胱氨酸蛋白61 (Cyr61)在子宫内膜癌诊断中的价值,为早期子宫内膜癌的诊断准确性提供依据.方法收集2015年5月-2018年5月疑存在子宫内膜癌患者56作为研究对象,所有受试者均进行宫腔镜以及Ki67、Cyr61检测,以手术病理检测结果为金标准,比较宫腔镜、Ki67、Cyr61各检测结果的总符合率,应用ROC曲线分析Ki67、Cyr61诊断价值,并对比患者宫腔镜、Ki67、Cyr61单项检测以及三项联合检测的诊断效能.结果病理学检测结果显示56例患者中子宫内膜癌42例,非子宫内膜癌14例.经宫腔镜检测56例患者中子宫内膜癌27例,非子宫内膜癌29例,总诊断符合率为60.71%.ROC曲线分析显示Ki67诊断子宫内膜癌的ROC曲线AUC为0.764,截断值为0.16,灵敏度为64.29%,特异度为57.14%;ROC曲线分析显示Cyr61诊断子宫内膜癌ROC曲线AUC为0.760,截断值为2.97,灵敏度为66.67%,特异度为42.86%.联合检测在子宫内膜癌中的准确度、灵敏度分别为91.07%、90.48%显著高于单项检测,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论在子宫内膜癌诊断中宫腔镜为安全有效诊断方式,联合Ki67、Cyr61诊断其诊断价值更高,为临床诊断与治疗提供一定参考. Objective To explore the value of hysteroscopy combined with nuclear proliferative antigen Ki67(Ki67) and homocysteine 61(Cyr61) in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma,provide a basis for improving diagnostic accuracy of early endometrial carcinoma. Methods Fifty-six patients suspected of endometrial carcinoma were collected as study object from May 2015 to May 2018,hysteroscopy combined with Ki67 and Cyr61 detection were performed,taking the results of surgery and pathological examination as gold standard,the total coincidence rates of hysteroscopy,Ki67 and Cyr61 detection. ROC was used to analyze the diagnostic value of Ki67 and Cyr61. The diagnostic efficiencies of single detections of hysteroscopy,Ki67,Cyr61 and combined detection were compared. Results Pathological examination showed that there were 42 patients with endometrial carcinoma and 14 patients without endometrial carcinoma. Hysteroscopy showed that there were 27 atients with endometrial carcinoma and 29 patients without endometrial carcinoma. The total diagnostic coincidence rate was 60. 71%. ROC showed that the area under the curve(AUC),cut-off value,sensitivity,and specificity of Ki67 in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma were 0. 764,0. 16,64. 29%,and 57. 14%,respectively;AUC,cut-off value,sensitivity,and specificity of Cyr61 in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma were 0. 760,2. 97,66. 67%,and 42. 86%,respectively;the sensitivity and specificity of joint detection in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma were 91. 07% and 90. 48%,respectively,which were statistically significantly higher than those of single detection(P<0. 05). Conclusion Hysteroscopy is a safe and effective method in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma,the diagnostic value of hysteroscopy combined with Ki67 and Cyr61 is higher,which can provide a certain reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
作者 雷蕾 刘红梅 LEI Lei;LIU Hong-Mei(Department of Gynecology, Yangling Demonstration Zone Hospital, Xianyang, Shaanxi 712100, China)
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 2019年第16期3650-3653,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 陕西省社会发展科技攻关项目(2015SF-117)
关键词 宫腔镜 细胞核增殖抗原Ki67 高半胱氨酸蛋白 子宫内膜癌 诊断价值 Hysteroscopy Nuclear proliferation antigen Ki67 Homocysteine protein Endometrial carcinoma Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献143

  • 1王明,冯力民.宫腔镜技术在诊治子宫内膜癌及癌前病变中的作用[J].妇产与遗传(电子版),2012,2(2):9-15. 被引量:4
  • 2徐锦屏,张芸.p53和雌、孕激素受体在子宫内膜癌的表达及其临床意义[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2004,16(3):166-167. 被引量:5
  • 3金巧凤,赖爱鸾,张丹,李燕东.彩超、宫腔镜、病理对子宫内膜病变诊断价值的研究[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2006,7(4):260-263. 被引量:33
  • 4Richard G. Moore,Amy K. Brown,M. Craig Miller,Donna Badgwell,Zhen Lu,W. Jeffrey Allard,C.O. Granai,Robert C. Bast,Karen Lu.Utility of a novel serum tumor biomarker HE4 in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus[J]. Gynecologic Oncology . 2008 (2)
  • 5Laura J. Havrilesky,Clark M. Whitehead,Jennifer M. Rubatt,Robert L. Cheek,John Groelke,Qin He,Douglas P. Malinowski,Timothy J. Fischer,Andrew Berchuck.Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence[J]. Gynecologic Oncology . 2008 (3)
  • 6Richard G. Moore,Amy K. Brown,M. Craig Miller,Steven Skates,W. Jeffrey Allard,Thorsten Verch,Margaret Steinhoff,Geralyn Messerlian,Paul DiSilvestro,C.O. Granai,Robert C. Bast.The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass[J]. Gynecologic Oncology . 2007 (2)
  • 7Laura Zanotti,Eliana Bignotti,Stefano Calza,Elisabetta Bandiera,Giuseppina Ruggeri,Claudio Galli,Germana Tognon,Monica Ragnoli,Chiara Romani,Renata A. Tassi,Luigi Caimi,Franco E. Odicino,Enrico Sartori,Sergio Pecorelli,Antonella Ravaggi.Human epididymis protein 4 as a serum marker for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and prediction of clinical outcome[J]. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine . 2012 (12)
  • 8Grimsby GM,Gray R,Dueck A,et al.Is there concordance of invasive breast cancer pathologic tumor size with magnetic resonance iraaging?[J].Am J Surg,2009,198⑷:500-504.DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.012.
  • 9Ytre-Hauge S,Husby JA,Magnussen IJ,et aL Preoperative tumor size at MRI predicts deep myometrial invasion,lymph node metastases,and patient outcome in endometrial carcinomas[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2015,25(3):459-466.DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000Q00000000367.
  • 10Chattopadhyay S,Cross P,Nayar A,et al.Tumor size:a better independent predictor of distant failure and death than depth of myometrial invasion in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2013,23(4):690-697.DOI:10.1097/lGC.0b013e31828c85c6.

共引文献173

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部